| 试论民事证明责任的法律性质 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 奚玮,张韬.试论民事证明责任的法律性质[J].安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2001,29(4):590-594. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 奚玮 张韬 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 安徽师范大学经济法政学院
2. 安徽师范大学人事处 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 提供证据责任与证明责任有着本质上的差异，将二者罗死在一个“举证责任”概念之下，并从提供证据的立场把握证明责任的法律性质是难以解决问题的，考察举证责任制度的历史沿革，可以看出两大法系的举证责任理论都承认在举证责任的不同解释中证明责任为其本质，证明责任的法律性质应为负担，是当案件事实于最后仍真伪不明时，一方当事人所承担的不利后果。
|
| 关 键 词： | 提供证据责任 民事证明责任 法律性质 举证责任制度 刑事诉讼法 案件事实 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-2435(2001)04-0590-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2001年9月15日 |
On the nature of burden of proof |
| |
| XI Wei.On the nature of burden of proof[J].Journal of Anhui Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences),2001,29(4):590-594. |
| |
| Authors: | XI Wei |
| |
| Abstract: | There is an essential distinction between the burden of producing evidence and the burden of proof.It is difficult to solve the problem while considering them as one concept as well as seeing through the nature of burden of proof from the stand of producing evidence.From inspecting the history of producing evidence system,we can find that the burden of proof is essence in the theory of producing evidence both in crimal law and civil law.The nature of burden of proof is burden and disadvantages which are taken by one litigant while the case can not be tried at last. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
