| 反兴奋剂公共利益的学理探析及启示 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李睿智,郭树理.反兴奋剂公共利益的学理探析及启示[J].南京体育学院学报(社会科学版),2019,2(6):79-87. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李睿智 郭树理 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 苏州大学 王健法学院,江苏 苏州 215006,苏州大学 王健法学院,江苏 苏州 215006 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社会科学基金项目：反对与防治兴奋剂的法律机制研究（项目编号：17BTY007）。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 全球化背景下，现代体育蓬勃发展，国际和国内层面的反兴奋剂斗争从未停下迈向协调和统一的脚步。与此同时，反兴奋剂的公共利益属性也逐步获得广泛认同，但关于这一主题的学理思考依然缺位。以兴奋剂的危害性为逻辑起点，结合公共利益含义和特点的相关理论进行考察，能够对反兴奋剂公共利益形成更为全面和立体的认识。基于全球公民社会理论，可以认为反兴奋剂公共利益是一种全球公共利益。反兴奋剂是公私合作关系在体育语境下最主要的应用领域，应当予以坚持，通过优势互补推动反兴奋剂斗争的发展。因我国体育协会性质特殊，为更好地推动反兴奋剂斗争的前进与体育行业的发展，我国应当尽快建立仲裁机制。
|
| 关 键 词： | 反兴奋剂 公共利益 全球公民社会 公私合作关系 行政授权 仲裁机制 |
| 收稿时间： | 2019/7/22 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2019/8/12 0:00:00 |
A Theoretical Analysis of the Public Interest of Anti-doping and its Implications |
| |
| LI Rui-zhi and GUO Shu-li.A Theoretical Analysis of the Public Interest of Anti-doping and its Implications[J].Journal of Nanjing Institute of Physical Education,2019,2(6):79-87. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Rui-zhi and GUO Shu-li |
| |
| Institution: | Kenneth Wang School of Law,Soochow University,Suzhou 215000,China and Kenneth Wang School of Law,Soochow University,Suzhou 215000,China |
| |
| Abstract: | In the context of globalization, with the vigorous development of modern sports, the fight against doping at the international and domestic levels has never stopped moving towards coordination and unity.?At the same time, the public interest attribute of anti-doping has been widely recognized, but the theoretical thinking on it is still absent.?Taking the harmfulness of doping as the logical starting point, combined with the relevant theories of the definition and characteristics of public interests, a more comprehensive understanding of the public interest of anti-doping can be formed.?Based on the theory of global civil society, it can be considered that the public interest of anti-doping is a kind of global public interest.?Anti-doping is the most important application of public-private partnership in the context of sports, which should be adhered to and used to promote the development of anti-doping struggle through complementary advantages. Because of the special nature of China''s sports associations, in order to better promote the progress of the anti-doping struggle and the development of the sports industry, the arbitration mechanism should be established as soon as possible. |
| |
| Keywords: | Anti-doping public interests global civil society public-private partnerships |
|
| 点击此处可从《南京体育学院学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《南京体育学院学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文 |
