| 克拉申“五个假说”之我见 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王军.克拉申“五个假说”之我见[J].黑龙江教育学院学报,2005,24(6):55-56. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王军 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 哈尔滨工程大学,黑龙江,哈尔滨,150001 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 克拉申有关二语习得的“五个假设”理论对第二语言教学模式的建立起着重要作用,但与此同时,该理论也存在着一些不完善之处。特别是在习得、学习假设、输入假设和年长与年幼学习者成功的比较三方面缺乏充分有力的论据来支持其观点,从而影响了该理论的说服力。
|
| 关 键 词： | 克拉申 五个假设 缺陷 分析 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-7836（2005）06-0055-02 |
| 收稿时间： | 2005-04-18 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年4月18日 |
Different Views on Krashen's "Five Hypotheses" |
| |
| WANG Jun.Different Views on Krashen's "Five Hypotheses"[J].Journal of Heilongjiang College of Education,2005,24(6):55-56. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Jun |
| |
| Institution: | Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Stephen Krashen's theory of "five hypotheses" concerning the second language acquisition made a great contribution to the establishment of the second language teaching model.However,there are still some defects about its content,which is deficient in strong arguments to support his views on the respects of the acquisition/learning hypothesis,the input hypothesis and the comparative success of younger and older learners in particular.As a result,the theory appears to be less convincing to some extent. |
| |
| Keywords: | Kra shen five hypotheses defects analysis |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
