| 早期“新批评派”文学史观略窥 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 聂家伟,苗鸿满.早期“新批评派”文学史观略窥[J].河池学院学报,2014(1):17-20. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 聂家伟 苗鸿满 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 云南民族大学人文学院,云南昆明650500 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 新批评派以摒弃对文学史的分析而著称，但是通过分析三位早期新批评派理论家——休姆、艾略特和瑞恰慈的理论思想，可以看出这三位早期新批评派理论家并没有像后来新批评派那样摒弃对文学史的考察。他们的文学史观可以总结为“文学发展观”和“文学有机观”，但是，可惜的是，后来的新批评派并没有继承这两种文学史观的观点。
|
| 关 键 词： | 新批评 文学史 发展观 有机观 |
A Glimpse of Literary History of New Criticism in Its Early Period |
| |
| NIE Jia-wei; MIAO Hong-man.A Glimpse of Literary History of New Criticism in Its Early Period[J].Journal of Hechi University,2014(1):17-20. |
| |
| Authors: | NIE Jia-wei; MIAO Hong-man |
| |
| Institution: | NIE Jia-wei; MIAO Hong-man ( College of Humanities, Yunnan University of Nationalities, Kunming, Yunnan 650500, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The New Criticism was known for abandoning the analysis of the history of literature. But by an- alyzing theoretical ideas of three early New Criticism theorists （ Hulme, Eliot and Richards）, it will be obvious that the three early critics did not abandon the investigation of the history of literature as the later New Criticism did. Their points of literary history can be summed up as ＂literary evolvement＂ and ＂Literary organism＂. Howev- er, it is a pity that the later New Criticism did not inherit these two oersDectives. |
| |
| Keywords: | The New Criticism literary history literary evolvement literary organism |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
