| 刑法理论中的"事后故意"之批判 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 马长生,黄谷会.刑法理论中的"事后故意"之批判[J].通化师范学院学报,2007,28(1):36-38. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 马长生 黄谷会 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湖南师范大学,法学院,湖南,长沙,410081 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我因刑法理论界对犯罪故意的分类有事前故意和事后故意之说.文中结合案例,以这种分类所依据的标准为切入点,进而对事前故意与事后故意两个概念从法理上展开分析,论证了这一学理分类所依据的标准本身存在逻辑错误,从而否定了这种分类的科学性以及事后敌意概念的合理性.
|
| 关 键 词： | 故意 事前故意 事后故意 批判 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-7974(2007)01-0036-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年8月28日 |
On Criticism of "Intent after the Fact" in the Theory of Criminal Law |
| |
| MA Chang-sheng.On Criticism of "Intent after the Fact" in the Theory of Criminal Law[J].Journal of Tonghua Teachers College,2007,28(1):36-38. |
| |
| Authors: | MA Chang-sheng |
| |
| Institution: | College of Law, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hanan 410081 |
| |
| Abstract: | There is a theory held by the theoretical field of Chinese criminal law that criminal intent can be divided into intent before the fact and intent after the fact. In the light of cases, this paper starts with the basis on which criminal intent is divided, analyzes jurisprudentially the term of intent before the fact and that of intent after the fact, and demonstrates the logical error of the basis on which criminal intent is divided, thus negatives the scientific division and the reasonable term of intent after the fact. |
| |
| Keywords: | intent intent before the fact intent after the fact criticism |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
