| Biomechanical analysis of the "running" vs. "conventional" diagonal stride uphill techniques as performed by elite cross-country skiers |
| |
| 作者姓名： | Barbara Pellegrini Chiara Zoppirolli Federico Stella Lorenzo Bortolan Hans-Christer Holmberg Federico Schena |
| |
| 作者单位： | CeRiSM（Research Centre of Mountain Sport and Health）;Department of Neuroscience;Swedish Winter Sports Research Centre;School of Kinesiology;Biomechanics Laboratory |
| |
| 摘 要： | Purpose:This study aimed to compare biomechanical aspects of a novel"running"diagonal stride(DSRUN)with"conventional"diagonal stride(DSCONV)skiing techniques performed at high speed.Methods:Ten elite Italian male junior cross-country skiers skied on a treadmill at 10 km/h and at a 10°incline utilizing both variants of the diagonal stride technique.The 3-dimensional kinematics of the body,poles,and roller skis;the force exerted through the poles and foot plantar surfaces;and the angular motion of the leg joints were determined.Results:Compared to DSCONV,DSRUN demonstrated shorter cycle times(1.05±0.05 s vs.0.75±0.03 s(mean±SD),p<0.001)due to a shorter rolling phase(0.40±0.04 s vs.0.09±0.04 s,p<0.001);greater force applied perpendicularly to the roller skis when they had stopped rolling forward(413±190 N vs.890±170 N,p<0.001),with peak force being attained earlier;prolonged knee extension,with a greater range of motion during the roller ski-stop phase(28°±40 vs.16°±3°,p=0.00014);and more pronounced hip and knee flexion during most of the forward leg swing.The mechanical work performed against friction during rolling was significantly less with DSRUN than with DSCONV(0.04±0.01 J/m/kg vs.0.10±0.02 J/m/kg,p<0.001).Conclusion:Our findings demonstrate that DSRUN is characterize by more rapid propulsion,earlier leg extension,and a greater range of motion of knee joint extension than DSCONV-Further investigations,preferably on snow,should reveal whether DSRUN results in higher acceleration and/or higher peak speed.
|
| 关 键 词： | Classical skiing Kinetics Roller skiing |
| 收稿时间： | 29 December 2019 |
Biomechanical analysis of the “running” vs. “conventional” diagonal stride uphill techniques as performed by elite cross-country skiers |
| |
| Institution: | 1. CeRiSM (Research Centre of Mountain Sport and Health), University of Verona, Rovereto 38068, Italy;2. Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement, University of Verona, Verona 37129, Italy;3. Swedish Winter Sports Research Centre, Department of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Östersund 83125, Sweden;4. School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC V6T 1Z1, Canada;5. Biomechanics Laboratory, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China |
| |
| Abstract: | PurposeThis study aimed to compare biomechanical aspects of a novel “running” diagonal stride (DSRUN) with “conventional” diagonal stride (DSCONV) skiing techniques performed at high speed.MethodsTen elite Italian male junior cross-country skiers skied on a treadmill at 10 km/h and at a 10° incline utilizing both variants of the diagonal stride technique. The 3-dimensional kinematics of the body, poles, and roller skis; the force exerted through the poles and foot plantar surfaces; and the angular motion of the leg joints were determined.ResultsCompared to DSCONV, DSRUN demonstrated shorter cycle times (1.05 ± 0.05 s vs. 0.75 ± 0.03 s (mean ± SD), p < 0.001) due to a shorter rolling phase (0.40 ± 0.04 s vs. 0.09 ± 0.04 s, p < 0.001); greater force applied perpendicularly to the roller skis when they had stopped rolling forward (413 ± 190 N vs. 890 ± 170 N, p < 0.001), with peak force being attained earlier; prolonged knee extension, with a greater range of motion during the roller ski-stop phase (28° ± 4° vs. 16° ± 3°, p = 0.00014); and more pronounced hip and knee flexion during most of the forward leg swing. The mechanical work performed against friction during rolling was significantly less with DSRUN than with DSCONV (0.04 ± 0.01 J/m/kg vs. 0.10 ± 0.02 J/m/kg, p < 0.001).ConclusionOur findings demonstrate that DSRUN is characterize by more rapid propulsion, earlier leg extension, and a greater range of motion of knee joint extension than DSCONV. Further investigations, preferably on snow, should reveal whether DSRUN results in higher acceleration and/or higher peak speed. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 维普 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
