首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

29、30届奥运会中国男篮进攻方式与得分效率差异对比研究
引用本文:张利超,石俊宝.29、30届奥运会中国男篮进攻方式与得分效率差异对比研究[J].广州体育学院学报,2015,35(1):87-90.
作者姓名:张利超  石俊宝
作者单位:1. 仲恺农业工程学院体育部,广东广州,510225
2. 青岛职业技术学院,山东青岛,266555
摘    要:通过对比29、30届奥运会中国男篮所有比赛,找出两届奥运会中国男篮进攻方式与得分效率的差异,为以后中国队比赛做参考.采用录像解析法,运用新奥特喜马拉雅非线性编辑软件和Adobe Premiere Pro CS3非线性编辑软件,将伦敦奥运会与北京奥运会中国男篮所有比赛分割出每一个回合,统计出中国队每一名队员进攻方式及相应的技术数据,再运用数理统计从量化的角度使用SPSS13.0进行数据统计分析.得出结论:北京奥运会中国队围绕内线进攻,内线作为中枢篮下强攻或被包夹向外转移球找进攻得分机会.伦敦奥运会中国队以快为主,偏重个人进攻,以个人突破找进攻机会.两届奥运会中国队在整体进攻时缺乏配合,在对手强有力的进攻式防守下我们的单打独斗太多,分球过少,命中率偏低.

关 键 词:29、30届奥运会  中国男篮  得分比例  命中率
收稿时间:2014/10/18 0:00:00

Comparative Study on Attack and Scoring for the Chinese Male Basketball team in the 29th and the 30th Olympic Games
ZHANG Li-chao,SHI Jun-bao.Comparative Study on Attack and Scoring for the Chinese Male Basketball team in the 29th and the 30th Olympic Games[J].Journal of Guangzhou Physical Education Institute,2015,35(1):87-90.
Authors:ZHANG Li-chao  SHI Jun-bao
Abstract:In order to make useful suggestions for the future competitions for the Chinese male basketball team, this paper compared all the competitions in the 29th and 30th Olympic Games, identified the difference of attacking mode and scoring efficiency between the two sessions. By using video analysis, while using Himalaya NLE System and Adobe Premiere Pro CS3. And then use mathematical statistics for data using SPSS13.0 statistical analysis from the perspective of quantitative, draw the conclusion that, the Chinese mainly used Interior-line Attack in the Beijing Olympic Games. And they used fast break, mainly individual performance in London. In both, the Chinese male basketball team lack of coordination in the attack, so under the strong defensive, we need more teamwork.
Keywords:
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《广州体育学院学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《广州体育学院学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号