| 体育专业大学生防御方式性别差异的元分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 徐守森,韩桂凤,孙经伟.体育专业大学生防御方式性别差异的元分析[J].首都体育学院学报,2011,23(3):281-284. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 徐守森 韩桂凤 孙经伟 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 首都体育学院,北京,100191 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 为了解体育专业大学生的防御方式是否存在性别差异。采用元分析的方法,对4篇研究进行统计分析,比较体育专业大学生在3种防御方式和掩饰因子得分上的性别差异。结果表明:不成熟防御方式d-value为-0.15,95%CI为-0.25~-0.04;成熟防御方式d-value为-0.11,95%CI为-0.23~0.01;中间型防御方式d-value为-0.25,95%CI为-0.38~-0.13;掩饰因子d-value为0.10,95%CI为-0.03~0.22。最后得出结论:体育专业大学生的不成熟防御方式和中间型防御方式,女生略高于男生;成熟防御方式和掩饰因子,不存在性别差异。
|
| 关 键 词： | 防御方式 元分析 大学生 体育专业 性别差异 |
Meta-Analytic Review on Gender Difference of Defensive Style of College Students with Physical Education Major |
| |
| XU Shousen,HAN Guifeng,SUN Jingwei.Meta-Analytic Review on Gender Difference of Defensive Style of College Students with Physical Education Major[J].Journal of Capital College of Physical Education,2011,23(3):281-284. |
| |
| Authors: | XU Shousen HAN Guifeng SUN Jingwei |
| |
| Institution: | XU Shousen,HAN Guifeng,SUN Jingwei Capital Institute of Physical Education,Beijing 100191,China. |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective:To explore the gender difference of defensive style of college students with physical education major.Method:using meta-analytic method to calculate 4 studies.Results:d-value of immature defense style is-0.15,95% CI is-0.25～-0.04;d-value of mature defense style is-0.11,95% CI is-0.23～0.01;d-value of intermediate/neurotic defense style is-0.25,95% CI is-0.38～-0.13,d-value of image distorting factor is 0.10,95% CI is-0.03～0.22.Conclusion:In the immature and intermediate/neurotic defense style,the score of female students is slightly higher than that of male college students with physical education major;and there is no gender difference in the mature defensive style and image distorting factor between male and female college student with physical education major. |
| |
| Keywords: | defensive style meta-analysis college student physical education major gender difference |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
