首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

国家赔偿的悖论——以“农夫、统一事件”为例
引用本文:袁伟伟.国家赔偿的悖论——以“农夫、统一事件”为例[J].贵阳师范高等专科学校学报,2010,5(3):30-34.
作者姓名:袁伟伟
作者单位:山东大学,法学院,山东,济南,250100 
摘    要:我国的国家赔偿总的归责原则是违法责任原则,赔偿标准采取直接的物质性损失赔偿原则。农夫山泉和统一企业所遭受的侵害来自于行政机关的职务违法行为,产生了明显的损害后果,这一损害和行政机关的违法行为之间有直接的因果关系,属于国家赔偿的法定范围,但从国家赔偿标准的规定来考量。两受害者的损失却无法得到赔偿。以上悖论可以通过在归责原则中兼采结果原则,并提高损害赔偿标准的路径来解决。

关 键 词:农夫山泉  统一企业  赔偿  国家赔偿

Paradox of State Compensation——Taking "Nongfu Spring, Unification Enterprise Event" as an Example
YUAN Wei-wei.Paradox of State Compensation——Taking "Nongfu Spring, Unification Enterprise Event" as an Example[J].Journal of GuiYang Teacher's College(Social Science),2010,5(3):30-34.
Authors:YUAN Wei-wei
Institution:YUAN Wei-wei (Law School, Shandong University, Jinan Shandong 250100, China)
Abstract:The total doctrine of liability fixation is illegal liability principle in our eountry's state compensation, and the direct material loss compensation principle is adopted in the compensation standard. The infringement on Nongfu Spring and Unification Enterprise arises from the official illegal behavior of administrative organs, producing evident damage resuhs, which is closely related to the official illegal behavior of administrative organs, belonging to the range of state compensation. However, their damages cannot he compensated from the regulations of state compensation standard. The above paradox can be solved through adopting the resulting principle in the doctrine of liability fixation and improving the damage compensation standard.
Keywords:Nongfu Spring  Unification enterprise  compensation  state compensation
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号