| "体育"本体论(二)——体育概念批判 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 宋震昊."体育"本体论(二)——体育概念批判[J].南京体育学院学报(社会科学版),2006,20(3):1-6. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 宋震昊 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南京体育学院,研究生部,江苏,南京,210014 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 现行的体育概念都以“身体练习为基本手段”,实现“促进健康”、“为政治经济服务”等功能。它忽略了体育运动的执行主体———人本身,而是把人当成物,把人体的运动当成工具,完成某种目的,这是“见物不见人”。虽然体育的概念是时代的产物,客观上刺激了体育的全球化发展,但在今天它只能使体育物化、异化的程度日益提高,“见物不见人”的现象越来越多、越演越烈。体育三元论即把体育分成竞技运动、身体锻炼、身体教育三部分,从本质上说是功能论。体育概念应该反映体育的本质,所以功能论不能长期在位,而应该明确体育的本体取而代之。
|
| 关 键 词： | 体育的概念 实用主义哲学 体育三元论 功能论 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-1909(2006)03-0001-06 |
| 收稿时间： | 01 15 2006 12:00AM |
| 修稿时间： | 03 16 2006 12:00AM |
On the Essence of "Physical Education" Episode II:A Critical Discussion of the Concept |
| |
| SONG Zhen-hao.On the Essence of "Physical Education" Episode II:A Critical Discussion of the Concept[J].Journal of Nanjing Institute of Physical Education,2006,20(3):1-6. |
| |
| Authors: | SONG Zhen-hao |
| |
| Institution: | Nanjing Institute of Physical Education, Nanjing 210014 China |
| |
| Abstract: | The present concepts of physical education treat physical activities as basic means to realize health-promotion,political and economical profits.This functional explanation ignores the main body of physical education which is human being,treats sports of people as social instruments.I call it materialization and unhumanization.Although a product of its own time which helps the development of material world of physical education,the functionalized concept now only deteriorates the process of unhumanization.The trichotomy which separates PE into three major fields in China: athletic sports,public sports and physical education in a narrow sense is in fact functionalism.The concept of physical education should embody the essence and highest value of physical education.So we should use some real ontology to replace the functionalism theory which has ruled for a long period. |
| |
| Keywords: | Concept of physical education pragmatism trichotomy functionalism |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
