| 论"四萧"对儒家文学功利观的继承与超越 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 艾初玲.论"四萧"对儒家文学功利观的继承与超越[J].玉溪师范学院学报,2007,23(1):36-40. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 艾初玲 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湖南科技大学,人文学院,中文系,湖南,湘潭,411201 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 湖南省普通高等学校哲学社会科学重点研究基地"中国古代文学与社会文化研究基地"成果之一,湘教通[2004]284号. |
| |
| 摘 要： | “四萧”对文学政治功能的重视,同儒家诗教有着明显的血脉联系,他们在继承其基本内涵的同时更融入了自己的见解。与传统“风教”论相比,他们的观点蕴涵了两大新的指向:一是把政治功利的载体主要限制于儒家典籍,而非纯文学作品,二是推崇“风教”的“修身”功能,从而与社会兴衰治乱的主旨有所偏离。
|
| 关 键 词： | 四萧 风教 文学的独立性 修身 |
| 文章编号： | 1009-9506(2007)01-0036-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007年1月7日 |
On "Four Xiaos" Inheriting & Surpassing of the Utilitarian Outlook of Confucian Literature |
| |
| AI Chu-ling.On "Four Xiaos" Inheriting & Surpassing of the Utilitarian Outlook of Confucian Literature[J].Journal of Yuxi Teachers' College,2007,23(1):36-40. |
| |
| Authors: | AI Chu-ling |
| |
| Abstract: | "Four Xiaos" who focus on the political function of literature are of one blood with Confucian school of poetic cultivation.They instill their viewpoints into their inheritance.Compared with the traditional theory of "poetic cultivation",their views have two characteristics:(1)the carrier of political utility is limited to the classical works rather than pure literary works;(2)their praise of "moral cultivation" through poetry deviates the theme of social vicissitudes. |
| |
| Keywords: | four Xiaos poetic cultivation independence of literature moral cultivation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
