| 《世界反兴奋剂条例》听证条款的法律解释学分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 孔蕊,姜世波.《世界反兴奋剂条例》听证条款的法律解释学分析[J].武汉体育学院学报,2020,54(3):34-38. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 孔蕊 姜世波 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 山东大学 人事处, 山东 青岛 266237;2. 山东大学 体育法治研究中心, 山东 威海 264209 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社会科学基金重大项目（18ZDA330）。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 法律解释学的文义解释、漏洞补充、法律论证理论对《世界反兴奋剂条例》第8条听证条款的认知具有应用价值。文义解释是听证条款优先解释方法,应将词语的通常意义作为解释的首要规则。通过漏洞补充认为兴奋剂听证适用瑞士行政听证规则,听证裁决应经国际奥委会核准后执行。通过法律论证认为保护运动员基本权利优先于国际奥委会确保体育纯洁、促进公平竞赛的目的,听证是否公开需要国际体育仲裁法庭综合考虑法律效果和社会效果的有机统一。运动员对世界反兴奋剂机构不遵守自己规则或不正确解释规则的行为有向瑞士联邦最高法院上诉的司法救济权利。
|
| 关 键 词： | 体育法学 兴奋剂 文义解释 漏洞补充 法律论证 |
| 收稿时间： | 2019-12-18 |
Hermeneutic Analysis of Hearing Provisions of World Anti-doping Code |
| |
| KONG Rui,JIANG Shibo.Hermeneutic Analysis of Hearing Provisions of World Anti-doping Code[J].Journal of Wuhan Institute of Physical Education,2020,54(3):34-38. |
| |
| Authors: | KONG Rui JIANG Shibo |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Personnel Dept., Shandong Univ., Qingdao 266237, China;2. Sports Rule by Law Research Center, Shandong Univ., Weihai 264209, China |
| |
| Abstract: | The semantic interpretation, the supplement of loopholes and the legal argumentation of law hermeneutics are applicable to the cognition of the hearing clause of article 8 of the World Anti-doping Code. Semantic interpretation is the preferred method of interpretation of hearing clauses, and the common meaning of words should be taken as the first rule of interpretation. Through loopholes, it is added that the doping hearing shall be subject to the Swiss administrative hearing rules, and the hearing decision shall be implemented after the approval of the International Olympic Committee. Through legal argument, it is believed that the protection of the basic rights of athletes takes precedence over the purpose of the National Olympic Committee to ensure the purity of sports and promote fair competition. Whether the hearing is open or not require the Court of Arbitration for Sport to consider the organic unity of legal effect and social effect. Athletes have the right to appeal to the Swiss Federal Supreme Court against WADA's failure to comply with its own rules or its incorrect interpretation of the rules. |
| |
| Keywords: | sports law doping direct interpretation supplement of loophole legal argument |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《武汉体育学院学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《武汉体育学院学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
