| 图书情报学领域作者合著方式对科研质量的影响分析——基于SciVal对中国高产机构的样本分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 卢东.图书情报学领域作者合著方式对科研质量的影响分析——基于SciVal对中国高产机构的样本分析[J].现代情报,2015,35(9):111-115. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 卢东 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国科学技术信息研究所, 北京 100038 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本文以我国大陆图书情报学领域15家高产学术机构为主要分析对象,以香港地区作为参照组,通过分析总体篇均被引次数、前10%高被引文献、国际合作百分比、国内合作百分比、机构内合作百分比以及相应合著的篇均被引频次等计量指标,分析中国高产学术机构不同的科研合著现状,并通过相关性分析验证不同的科研合著方式对科研质量产生的不同影响。经过研究分析发现,学术机构国际合著程度越高,其自身的科研质量越高,但机构内的合著程度越高,将不利于提高科研质量,同时未发现国内合著程度与科研质量相关。
|
Impact Analysis on Co-author Method to Scientific Research Quality in Library Information Science Field——Sample Analysis on China Productive Institution Based on SciVal |
| |
| Authors: | Lu Dong |
| |
| Institution: | Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China, Beijing 100038, China |
| |
| Abstract: | This paper used the 15 productive academic institutions of China in library information science field as statistical objects comparing to those institutions in Hong Kong and analyzed measurement indicators such as citation per publication, outputs in top percentile, international collaboration percentile, only national collaboration percentile, only institutional collaboration percentile, and each citation per publication.In order to identify scientific co-author status among productive academic institution in China and verify different co-author methods have different effect level on scientific research quality via correlation analysis.Based on the research, the higher the international collaboration level, the higher the scientific research quality level itself gets.The higher the only institutional collaboration level, however, would lead to lower scientific research quality level.Meanwhile, it is irrelevant between the only national collaboration and scientific research quality. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
| 点击此处可从《现代情报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《现代情报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
