| 人文社科学术著作评价指标体系构建及实证研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 姜春林,郭琪琴,张光耀.人文社科学术著作评价指标体系构建及实证研究[J].情报杂志,2022,41(2):198-206,封3. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 姜春林 郭琪琴 张光耀 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 大连理工大学科学学与科技管理研究所暨WISE实验室 大连 116085 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社会科学基金项目“融合多维信息计量指标的人文社会科学代表性学术专著评价方法与实现机制研究”(编号:18BTQ078)阶段性成果。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 研究目的]科学合理的人文社科学术著作评价指标体系能够为优秀成果评选、职称评定、项目评审及人才评价等学术评价活动提供理论依据与方法参考。研究方法]以高等学校科学研究优秀成果奖(人文社会科学)第3届至第7届获著作奖的27个学科的2175本著作为对象,做指标特征分析。综合考虑各项原则,遴选出5个一级、11个二级、28个三级评价指标,并进行学科分类。使用专家调查法、层次分析法、熵权法确定不同学科分类指标权重,完成评价指标体系的构建。以申报第8届高等学校科学研究优秀成果奖(人文社会科学)中的人文类、社科类和综合类的577本著作为实验数据,对指标体系进行了实证验证。研究结论]哲学、社会学实证结果与实际获奖情况比较一致,管理学则与实际获奖相关性不高。从学科属性、数据源等方面分析了原因,提出应加强书评数据库建设和著作全文本分析的建议。
|
| 关 键 词： | 人文社科 学术著作 著作评价 指标体系 补充计量学 |
Construction and Empirical Study of Evaluation Indicators System for Chinese Academic Books in Humanities and Social Sciences |
| |
| Jiang Chunlin,Guo Qiqin,Zhang Guangyao.Construction and Empirical Study of Evaluation Indicators System for Chinese Academic Books in Humanities and Social Sciences[J].Journal of Information,2022,41(2):198-206,封3. |
| |
| Authors: | Jiang Chunlin Guo Qiqin Zhang Guangyao |
| |
| Institution: | (WISE Lab,Institute of Science of Science and S&T Management,Dalian University of Technology,Dalian 116085) |
| |
| Abstract: | Research purpose]Scientific and reasonable evaluation indicator system of academic writings in humanities and social sciences provide theoretical basis and methods for academic evaluation activities such as evaluation of outstanding achievements,professional titles,project initiation,final project,and talent selection.Research method]This paper analyzes index characteristics of 2175 books from 27 disciplines that won Science Research Famous Achievement Award in Higher Institution(humanities and social sciences)(3rd-7th).This paper considers all the principles,including 5 first-level,11 second-level and 28 third-level evaluation indexes.We determine the weights of classification indexes of different disciplines and construct the evaluation index system by savant investigation,analytic hierarchy process(AHP)and entropy weight method(EWM).Then,we make an empirical verification of the indicator system using 577 books of humanities,social sciences and comprehensive disciplines that declare Science Research Famous Achievement Award in Higher Institution(humanities and social sciences)(8th).Research conclusion]The empirical results of philosophy and sociology are consistent with the actual award-winning situation,but inconsistent with management.This paper analyzes the reasons from the aspects of subject attributes and data sources,and puts forward that we should strengthen the construction of book review database and the full-text analysis of writings. |
| |
| Keywords: | humanities and social sciences academic works work evaluation indicators system Altmetrics |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
