| 临床实验性护理研究期刊论文的伦理审查状况分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 吴艳妮,周春兰.临床实验性护理研究期刊论文的伦理审查状况分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2015,26(12):1269-1272. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 吴艳妮 周春兰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南方医科大学南方医院《护理学报》编辑部, 广东省广州市广州大道北1838号 510515,南方医科大学南方医院《护理学报》编辑部, 广东省广州市广州大道北1838号 510515 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的]了解国内护理期刊伦理审查状况及存在问题,以促进护理期刊的伦理学正确导向作用。方法]以2014年版中国科技期刊引证报告(核心版)纳入的护理期刊为研究对象,分析2013-2014年国内12家护理学类统计源期刊刊发临床实验性护理研究论文的伦理审查状况。结果]我国12家护理统计源期刊近2年共刊发论文21080篇,其中临床实验性护理研究论文4799篇(22.8%)。文内提及患者或家属对研究知情同意的比例仅占临床实验性护理研究论文的41.2%(22.6%~81.5%),仅19.9%的论文在文内提及研究经伦理委员会批准(0%~64.6%)。结论]目前我国护理期刊伦理审查状况不容乐观,亟待提高期刊编审人员伦理审查意识,以促进临床实验性护理研究的伦理学规范。
|
| 关 键 词： | 护理统计源期刊 临床实验性护理研究 伦理学评价 |
| 收稿时间： | 2015/7/23 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2015/11/2 0:00:00 |
An ethical review of nursing clinical experimental research papers in nursing journals of statistic sources in China |
| |
| WU Yanni and ZHOU Chunlan.An ethical review of nursing clinical experimental research papers in nursing journals of statistic sources in China[J].Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals,2015,26(12):1269-1272. |
| |
| Authors: | WU Yanni and ZHOU Chunlan |
| |
| Institution: | Editorial Department of Journal of Nursing, Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China and Editorial Department of Journal of Nursing, Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Purposes] This paper aims at understanding the ethical review of nursing clinical experimental research papers in nursing journals of statistic sources in China and its existing problems to promote the guiding role in the ethics of nursing periodicals.Methods] All the clinical experimental research papers published in twelve core nursing periodicals from 2014 Chinese Scientific and Technical Journal Citation Reports (core) were retrieved for its ethical review.Findings] In recent two years, altogether 21,080 papers were published in these twelve nursing periodicals and 4,799 of them (22.8%)were focused on clinical experimental research and informed consents of patients or their families were mentioned in 41.2% of these papers. However, only 19.9% of the clinical experimental researches were approved by the ethical committee.Conclusions] There is no extensive ethical review in nursing periodicals. It is urgent to improve the ethical consciousness of periodical editors and to promote the ethical standardization of nursing clinical experimental research. |
| |
| Keywords: | Nursing journal of statistic sources Nursing clinical experimental research Ethical assessment |
|
| 点击此处可从《中国科技期刊研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《中国科技期刊研究》下载免费的PDF全文 |
