| 协同创新如何避免价值共毁？——参与者异质性视角的模糊集定性比较分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 协同创新如何避免价值共毁？——参与者异质性视角的模糊集定性比较分析.协同创新如何避免价值共毁？——参与者异质性视角的模糊集定性比较分析[J].科学学研究,2022,40(3):565-576. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 协同创新如何避免价值共毁？——参与者异质性视角的模糊集定性比较分析 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 西北大学经济管理学院;2. 西北大学;3. ; |
| |
| 基金项目： | 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目;陕西省自然科学基础研究计划面上项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 基于参与者异质性理论、社会交换理论结合中国情境构建“异质性—社会交换/政府干预—协同创新绩效”分析框架，通过模糊集定性比较分析对123个案例进行实证研究。研究发现：①存在4条导致高协同创新绩效的组态；②在协同创新避免价值共毁问题上，高决策权力异质性、高目标异质性与强资源交换、高文化异质性与强资源交换三组条件存在相互替代关系；在强资源交换、强信息交换并存时，参与者单维异质性与政府干预的组合同参与者多维异质性可以相互替代。③政府干预对避免价值共毁的有效性存在特定边界条件，在参与者单维异质性存在的背景下，政府干预有效且必要。研究为协同创新的可持续发展提供了理论依据和管理启示。
|
| 收稿时间： | 2020-12-31 |
How does collaborative innovation avoid value co-destruction?Qualitative comparative analysis of fuzzy sets from the perspective of actors’ heterogeneity |
| |
| Abstract: | Actors’ heterogeneity brings diversified resources and information to the collaborative innovation network, which is the basic premise of collaborative innovation value creation. However, there is still a lack of empirical analysis on how actors’ heterogeneity affects collaborative innovation value creation. Based on the theory of actors’ heterogeneity, social exchange theory and China's real situation, the analysis framework of "heterogeneity—social exchange/government intervention—collaborative innovation performance" is constructed, and 123 cases are empirically studied through fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. The results found that: ①There are four configurations that lead to high collaborative innovation performance. ②In terms of promoting the value creation of collaborative innovation, the three sets of conditions of high decision-making power heterogeneity, high goal heterogeneity and strong resource exchange, high cultural heterogeneity and strong resource exchange have a mutual substitution relationship; in strong resource exchange and strong information When exchanges coexist, the combination of the unidimensional heterogeneity of participants and government intervention and the multidimensional heterogeneity of actors can be substituted for each other. ③Government intervention has certain boundary conditions for the effectiveness of collaborative innovation value creation. Under the background of the unidimensional heterogeneity of actors, government intervention is effective and necessary. The research further clarified the "black box" of the process of multi-agent collaborative innovation, empirically tested the boundary conditions of the effectiveness of government intervention on collaborative innovation, and provided theoretical basis and management enlightenment for the sustainable development of collaborative innovation. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
| 点击此处可从《科学学研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《科学学研究》下载免费的PDF全文 |
