| 我国科技政策学研究态势及国际比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 我国科技政策学研究态势及国际比较.我国科技政策学研究态势及国际比较[J].科学学研究,2017,35(9):1289-1300. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 我国科技政策学研究态势及国际比较 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 中国医学科学院医学信息研究所/图书馆
2. 中国科学技术发展战略研究院 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金项目;国家自然科学基金项目;中国医学科学院医学与健康科技创新工程 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本文采用科学计量学方法,以科技论文和资助项目为主要资料,对2011年以来国际上发表的科技政策研究论文、以及美国SciSIP计划、日本SciREX计划和中国国家自然科学基金委员会管理科学部“科技管理与政策”相关的规划布局和资助项目进行定量和定性综合分析,揭示国际和我国科技政策学的研究态势。美国科技政策“学”强调“科学基础”,主要侧重于服务政府部门的科技政策制定和政策过程的科学化;日本则倾向“学科建设”,包括国家重要政策议题的专题研究（任务导向研究）,针对科技政策学术共同体的课题资助（自由申请研究）,机构设置与人才培养,以及数据基础设施建设。发展我国的科技政策学,建议同时借鉴日本学科建设的思路以及美国协调各政府部门政策过程的思路;建议加强社会科学与自然科学的跨学科融合研究,考虑设置“科技政策研究”专项资助渠道与多元资助机制;建议将数据基础设施建设作为一项基础性、战略性任务;建议建立政策研究界和决策者之间的建制性交流研讨机制等。
|
| 收稿时间： | 2017-07-28 |
The Development of Science,Technology and Innovation Policy Studies in China: a Scientometric Analysis |
| |
| Abstract: | In order to figure out the progress of Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) Policy Studies in China from an international perspective, this paper took an integrated scientometric analysis on both the STI Policy publications, the SciSIP programs in the United States, the SciREX programs in Japan, and the research projects granted by National Natural Science Foundation of China between 2011 and 2017. The Science of Science Policy in the United States aims to advance the scientific basis of science and innovation policy, while the Science of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy in Japan appears to take the science of STI policy into a framework of disciplines construction. The "Science of STI Policy" program consists of the following: 1) Preparation of a promoting system (Steering Committee) of "SciREX", 2) Promoting mission-oriented investigation and research, 3) Funding for R&D projects, 4) Foundation of hub institutions for fundamental researches and human resource development, and 5) Development of data and information infrastructure. The development of China's science of STI policy could consider the experiences from both US and Japan. We suggest to strengthen the interdisciplinary integrated STI policy studies between social sciences and natural sciences. It is necessary to initiative a specific STI policy R&D funding mechanism and a systematic communication mechanism between policy researchers and policy makers in China. We proposed that the data and information infrastructure act as a basic and strategic task in developing China’s Science of STI Policy. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《科学学研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《科学学研究》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
