| 对"排比"修辞格定义的质疑 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 吴定军.对"排比"修辞格定义的质疑[J].铜仁学院学报,2004,6(Z1):27. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 吴定军 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 德旺中学,贵州,江口,554400 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 排比是最常用的修辞手法,按照现在通行的定义应为三个或三个以上短语或句子的排列使用,这个量的规定显然不科学,因为它没有把两个短语或句子的排列使用概括进去,应该在量的限制上修改为"二个或二个以上"较为妥当.
|
| 关 键 词： | 排比 修辞手法 质疑 |
| 文章编号： | 1671-9972(2004)Supp.-0027-(02) |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年3月15日 |
Query into the Definition of "Parallelism" |
| |
| Wu Dingjun.Query into the Definition of "Parallelism"[J].Journal of Tongren University,2004,6(Z1):27. |
| |
| Authors: | Wu Dingjun |
| |
| Abstract: | The parallelism is the most frequently used rhetoric tactics. According to the current definition now. It requires three or more phrases or sentences should be used in parallel. However, the regulation of this quantity is obviously not scientific, because it has not embraced the parallel use of two or more phrases or sentences . it is comparatively appropriate just to revise as "two or more" in the restriction of quantity. |
| |
| Keywords: | parallelism: rhetoric tactics query |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
