首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Provider ambivalence about using forensic medical evaluation to respond to child abuse: A content and discourse analysis
Institution:1. School of Nursing, The University of Texas at Austin, United States;2. School of Social Work, The University of Texas at Austin, United States;1. University Children''s Hospital, Medical School, Skopje, Macedonia;2. Institute for Epidemiology and Biostatistics with Medical Informatics, Medical School, Skopje, Macedonia;1. Centre for Investigative Interviewing, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia;2. Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Canada;1. Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem 91905, Israel;2. Louis and Gabi Weisfeld School of Social Work, Bar-Ilan University, Israel;3. Department of Communication Disorders, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel;1. Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, 35340, Balcova, Izmir, Turkey;2. Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Child Psychiatry, 35340, Balcova, Izmir, Turkey;3. Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Social Pediatrics, 35340, Balcova, Izmir, Turkey;1. Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, USA;2. Department of Pediatrics, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, USA;3. Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, USA;4. Penn State University Dickinson School of Law, USA;5. Department of Humanities, Penn State College of Medicine, USA;1. Department of Sociology, Wuhan University of Technology, China;2. The Dickson Poon School of Law, King’s College London, UK;3. School of Social Work, University of Georgia, USA
Abstract:
Keywords:Child abuse  Forensic medical evaluation  Ambivalence  Legal role  Discourse analysis
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号