首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

对克里普克先验偶然命题的辩护
引用本文:龙小平.对克里普克先验偶然命题的辩护[J].西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2008,34(2):59-62.
作者姓名:龙小平
作者单位:电子科技大学政治与公共管理学院,四川成都610054
摘    要:在《命名与必然性》中,克里普克论证了“一米等于S在时间t0时的长度”是一个先验的偶然命题。因为,这是一个确定“一米”指称的定义,因而是一个先验命题;克里普克还从两个方面论证了“一米等于S在时间t0时的长度”是一个偶然命题,其一是这只是通过确定指称给出一个定义,所以该命题不是必然的;其二是通过指出“一米”是严格指示词,而“S在时间t0时的长度”是非严格指示词,所以该命题是偶然命题。

关 键 词:克里普克  先验偶然命题  巴黎标准尺
文章编号:1673-9841(2008)02-0059-04
收稿时间:2007-10-22
修稿时间:2007年10月22

Defending Kripke's Priori and Contingent Propositions
LONG Xiao-ping.Defending Kripke''''s Priori and Contingent Propositions[J].Journal of Southwest China Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition),2008,34(2):59-62.
Authors:LONG Xiao-ping
Institution:LONG Xiao-ping ( The School of Political Science and Public Administration, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu Sichuan 610054, China)
Abstract:In Naming and Necessity, Kripke argues that "S is one meter long at t0" is a priori, contingent proposition. "S is one meter long at t0" is a definition to fix the reference of one meter, so it should be a priori proposition. Kripke also demonstrates that "S is one meter long at t0" is a contingent proposition from two aspects. On the one hand, this statement only gives a definition by fixing reference, which means the proposition is not a necessity~ and on the other hand, "one meter" is a rigid designator, but"The length of S at t0" does not designate anything rigid.
Keywords:Kripke  priori and contingent proposition  the Paris standard meter
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号