| 归纳所达不到的跳跃!--浅析施泰默为归纳推理有效性的辩护 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王卓娅.归纳所达不到的跳跃!--浅析施泰默为归纳推理有效性的辩护[J].黔南民族师范学院学报,2005,25(5):26-31. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王卓娅 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 复旦大学,哲学系,上海,200433 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 休谟问题引发了为归纳推理有效性的辩护。迄今为止，凡是站在先验哲学立场上为归纳推理和归纳法进行辩护，最终都归于失败；直到施泰默应用大量科学事实为归纳辩护的出现，才为归纳问题的解决开辟了一条阳光之道。本文认为，为归纳推理有效性进行辩护的基础并非静态的事实，而是从假设出发归于事实的动态过程；为归纳推理有效性进行辩护的基础也并非唯一，不同的辩护者有不同的辩护过程，对辩护的基础，他们也会有不同的要求，这些不同的要求将决定归纳推理的命运。
|
| 关 键 词： | 休谟问题 归纳的逻辑辩护 施泰默的归纳辩护 实用主义 |
| 文章编号： | 1005-6769（2005）05-0026-06 |
| 收稿时间： | 2005-09-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年9月5日 |
The Leap in the Process of Induction Is Impossible ! ? --the Analysis of Stemmer Nathan's Justification for the Validity of Inductive Inference |
| |
| WANG Zhuo-ya.The Leap in the Process of Induction Is Impossible ! ? --the Analysis of Stemmer Nathan''''s Justification for the Validity of Inductive Inference[J].Journal of Qiannan Normal College of Nationalities,2005,25(5):26-31. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Zhuo-ya |
| |
| Institution: | Dept. of philosophy, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Hume's problem caused the justification for the validity of inductive inference.So far those justifications which stand transcendental position have resulted in failure.It had not found a new way to solve the inductive problem until Stemmer Nathan justified for induction with a great deal of scientific facts.This paper holds that the bases of the justification for the validity of inductive inference are not static facts,but dynamic processes from hypotheses to facts.Moreover the bases of the justification for the validity of inductive inference should not be the same,which means different justifiers could defend for induction in different processes.They may call for different bases of the justification for the validity of inductive inference,which will guide the future of inductive inference. |
| |
| Keywords: | Hume's problem logical justification for induction stemmer Nathan's justification for induction pragmatism |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
