| 究竟是"呼为和尚",还是"呼为和尚教坊"?——《从一则文献看引用文献的学术规范》内容辨正 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李士金.究竟是"呼为和尚",还是"呼为和尚教坊"?——《从一则文献看引用文献的学术规范》内容辨正[J].山西师大学报,2007,34(1):133-136. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李士金 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 淮阴师范学院中文系 江苏淮安223001 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 写文章引用文献需要标明原始文献的出处,这是非常重要的学术规范,但该文用以作为核心证据的论据和论点却是站不住脚的,对原文的理解有错误。经过后人标点的“原典”并不能作为文献内容标点正确与否的根据。
|
| 关 键 词： | 文章 引用文献 出处 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-5957(2007)01-0133-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-07-13 |
Is It Called Buddhist Monk , or Buddhist Monk's (Theatre)? |
| |
| LI Shi-jin.Is It Called Buddhist Monk , or Buddhist Monk''''s (Theatre)?[J].Journal of Shanxi Teachers University,2007,34(1):133-136. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Shi-jin |
| |
| Abstract: | It is a very important academic rule to note the original place when citing from the original references.However,this paper is not adequate as the core argument and supporting evidence since it has misinterpreted the original works.In other words,the original works marked by the followers can not be used to judge the adequacy of references. |
| |
| Keywords: | paper works quoted source |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
