首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Library and learning experiences turned mobile: A comparative study between LIS and non-LIS students
Institution:1. Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong;2. Faculty of Library, Information & Media Science, University of Tsukuba, Japan;3. School of Business and Public Administration, University of Guam, Mangilao 96923, Guam;4. Dept. of Information Management, Peking University, Beijing, China;5. Mount Allison University, Sackville, New Brunswick, Canada;6. Clark County Public Library, KY, USA;1. Department of Information and Communication Studies, University of Granada, Spain;2. Department of Library and Information Science, Carlos III University of Madrid, Spain;3. Academic Librarian, São Paulo University, Brazil
Abstract:The rapid developments of wireless telecommunication networks and the widespread increase of smartphone ownership around the world have created tremendous impacts on the services provided by institutions of higher education worldwide on several dimensions. Unarguably, mobile technologies have created new and unforeseen opportunities for educators, information services providers and students to experience the new horizon of teaching, learning, as well as knowledge transfer and creation. Taking into consideration that since Library and Information Science (LIS) students are training to become future LIS professionals, they are expected to be ready as well as active in integrating mobile technology into their daily learning practices.This study was set up to examine two groups of students (namely: LIS versus non-LIS students) at Peking University – their attitudes and level of activeness in adopting mobile technology in their daily life, as well as in their learning practices. Quantitative questionnaire survey was used for data collection, and a total number of 319 responses (i.e., LIS, 63 and non-LIS, 256) were collected from this study. Findings of this study reveal that no significant differences were found between the two student groups (LIS versus non-LIS) in many areas. In fact, both LIS and non-LIS student groups were using their smartphones to engage in different learning, research, social networking, pastimes, and recreational activities on similar level. However, it was concerning to note that the LIS student group was slightly less active in accessing the online services and resources provided by their university library. This was a particular finding that went against the researchers' original anticipation. However, such unexpected finding did not mean that these LIS students were necessarily less active or ‘open’ as mobile learners. For the reason that in comparison to their non-LIS counterparts, they were equally as active as in terms of using their mobile devices for other learning (particularly collaborative learning) and research purposes. Further studies are recommended to determine various factors that are hindering these LIS students from using the university library's online resources and services on a more active level.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号