| “要素说”与“动静说”之比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 吴稌年.“要素说”与“动静说”之比较[J].图书馆,2011(1):34-36,42. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 吴稌年 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 江南大学图书馆; |
| |
| 摘 要： | "要素说"已广为人们所熟知,"动静说"则长期被人们所忽视。要素说和动静说都是中国近代图书馆学理论上的丰碑,通过对两者的提出人的学科背景分析、两种理论的历史来源、受近代社会的影响和受美国哲学家杜威等影响的比较,对比了两者的主要共同点和不同点。
|
| 关 键 词： | 要素说 动静说 方法论 比较研究 图书馆学史 |
Comparison of the Essential Factor and the Motion and Static |
| |
| Wu Tunian.Comparison of the Essential Factor and the Motion and Static[J].Library,2011(1):34-36,42. |
| |
| Authors: | Wu Tunian |
| |
| Institution: | Wu Tunian(Jiangnan University Library) |
| |
| Abstract: | The Essential Factor and the Motion and Static are two monuments in theory.Through comparison of two theories in aspects of subject background,history source,influence of modern society and influence of John Dewey,this paper compares the point of agreement and point of difference in two theories. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
