Authorship analysis of specialized vs diversified research output |
| |
| Authors: | Giovanni Abramo Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo Flavia Di Costa |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Laboratory for Studies in Research Evaluation, Institute for System Analysis and Computer Science (IASI-CNR), National Research Council of Italy, Istituto di Analisi dei Sistemi e Informatica, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via dei Taurini 19, 00185 Roma, Italy;2. University of Rome “Tor Vergata” - Italy, Laboratory for Studies in Research Evaluation (IASI-CNR), Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Impresa, Università degli Studi di Roma “Tor Vergata”, Via del Politecnico 1, 00133 Roma, Italy;3. Research Value s.r.l., Via Michelangelo Tilli 39, 00156 Roma, Italy |
| |
| Abstract: | The present work investigates the relations between amplitude and type of collaboration (intramural, extramural domestic or international) and output of specialized versus diversified research. By specialized or diversified research, we mean within or beyond the author’s dominant research topic. The field of observation is the scientific production over five years from about 23,500 academics. The analyses are conducted at the aggregate and disciplinary level. The results lead to the conclusion that in general, the output of diversified research is no more frequently the fruit of collaboration than is specialized research. At the level of the particular collaboration types, international collaborations weakly underlie the specialized kind of research output; on the contrary, extramural domestic and intramural collaborations are weakly associated with diversified research. While the weakness of association remains, exceptions are observed at the level of the individual disciplines. |
| |
| Keywords: | Corresponding author Scientometrics Research collaborations Co-authorship Italy |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
