| 基于元数据的林业开放政府数据质量评估 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王博,温继文.基于元数据的林业开放政府数据质量评估[J].情报学报,2021(2):173-183. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王博 温继文 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京林业大学经济管理学院 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 林业开放政府数据质量评估有助于数据提供者管理数据,为使用者选择数据集提供依据。元数据作为描述数据资源出处、背景等信息的重要属性,可作为评估开放政府数据资源质量的基础。本文从客观视角开展大数据环境下林业开放政府数据质量评估的理论研究,基于林业开放政府数据资源特征与开放政府数据生命周期理论,本着科学、全面、针对性强、易操作的原则,从元数据质量的3个方面“形式-内容-使用效用”与开放政府数据生命周期的3个阶段“生成-开放-使用”,构建出系统全面的林业开放政府数据质量评估框架,设计评估指标的量化方法,并提出未来的研究方向,能够为一般性开放政府数据质量评估提供借鉴和参考,帮助提升开放政府数据的质量与价值。
|
| 关 键 词： | 林业开放政府数据 元数据质量 质量评估 |
Quality Evaluation of Forestry Open Government Data Based on Metadata |
| |
| Wang Bo,Wen Jiwen.Quality Evaluation of Forestry Open Government Data Based on Metadata[J].Journal of the China Society for Scientific andTechnical Information,2021(2):173-183. |
| |
| Authors: | Wang Bo Wen Jiwen |
| |
| Institution: | (School of Economics and Management,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083) |
| |
| Abstract: | A quality evaluation of forestry open government data helps data providers to manage data,providing a basis on which users can select datasets.Metadata,an important attribute to describe the origin and background of data resources,can be used as the basis to evaluate the quality of open government data.Based on the characteristics of forestry open government data resources,open government data life-cycle theory,and the principles of the data resources being scientific,comprehensive,pertinent,and easy to operate,this paper constructs a systematic and comprehensive forestry open government data quality evaluation model from the three aspects of data quality(form,content,and utility)and the three phases of the open government data life-cycle(generating,opening,and using),including evaluation frameworks and evaluation indicators,with quantitative methods.This paper also proposes future research directions that can provide references for general open government data quality evaluation,and it can help improve the quality and value of open government data. |
| |
| Keywords: | forestry open government data metadata quality quality evaluation |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
