首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

中美两国图书馆学、情报学研究方法、主题、对象、分析技术的比较研究
引用本文:华薇娜.中美两国图书馆学、情报学研究方法、主题、对象、分析技术的比较研究[J].情报学报,1997(1).
作者姓名:华薇娜
作者单位:南京大学信息管理系
摘    要:文章在对中美两国图书馆学情报学研究论文统计的基础上,通过对部分可比数据的并置,比较分析了两国在图书馆学情报学研究领域中在研究方法、主题、对象以及定量/定性分析技术方面的共同点与差异点。结果表明,我国在本专业研究领域中理论脱离实际的现象比较严重,研究方法比较单一。

关 键 词:图书馆学  情报学  研究方法  比较研究

Comparison between P.R.China & U.S.A.on Research Methods,Subjects,Objects and Quantitative/Non quantitative Techniques in the Field of Library and Information Science
Hua Weina.Comparison between P.R.China & U.S.A.on Research Methods,Subjects,Objects and Quantitative/Non quantitative Techniques in the Field of Library and Information Science[J].Journal of the China Society for Scientific andTechnical Information,1997(1).
Authors:Hua Weina
Abstract:Based on the statistics of articles published in two countries' library science core journals,this paper made some of the comparable statistics juxtaposed,compared and analyzed to find out the similarities and differences between P.R.China and U.S.A.from the respects of research methods,subjects,objects and quantitative/non-quantitative techniques.Then the hypothesis was proved that in our research field,the prominent weakness was that the theory divorced from practice,and the crux of the matter was the lack of advanced research methods.
Keywords:library science  information science  research method  comparative study
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号