| 论文学科交叉测度研究:从全部引文到章节引文 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张琳,刘冬东,吕琦,孙蓓蓓,黄颖.论文学科交叉测度研究:从全部引文到章节引文[J].情报学报,2020,39(5):492-499. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张琳 刘冬东 吕琦 孙蓓蓓 黄颖 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华北水利水电大学管理与经济学院,郑州 450046;武汉大学信息管理学院,武汉 430072;鲁汶大学ECOOM研究中心,鲁汶 B-3000;华北水利水电大学管理与经济学院,郑州 450046;武汉大学信息管理学院,武汉 430072;武汉大学信息管理学院,武汉 430072;鲁汶大学ECOOM研究中心,鲁汶 B-3000 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金面上项目“交叉科学的三维测度:内在知识基础、外在信息链接和科学活动模式”(71573085);河南省高等学校哲学社会科学研究优秀学者项目(2018-YXXZ-10)。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 量化测度研究成果的学科交叉性是交叉科学研究中的重要问题,对于理解学科交叉现象与学科发展规律具有重要意义。基于引文关系的学科多样性测度是学科交叉测度的主流方法,现有的研究大多将论文的参考文献作为一个整体来探究论文的学科交叉程度,忽略了不同章节参考文献的分布、不同参考文献的重要程度以及相同参考文献的多次引用等情况。本文尝试基于论文中不同章节的引文标注位置来探究不同章节的学科交叉程度,进而根据不同章节参考文献的重要程度来计算论文的加权学科交叉度。以2007-2016年发表在PLoS ONE期刊上的研究论文为例,研究结果表明:(1)引言(Introduction)、讨论(Discussion)、方法(Method)和结果(Results)四个章节的学科交叉程度依次降低;(2)与基于整体参考文献的学科交叉测度相比,基于引文标注位置的加权学科交叉度数值相对较低且分布更为集中。基于引文标注位置的学科交叉测度方法可以从内容的微观层面更加细致地测度论文的学科交叉水平,为交叉科学研究成果的测度和高交叉研究成果的识别提供了新的视角与思路。
|
| 关 键 词： | 跨学科研究 全文本分析 引文分析 引文标注 加权测度 |
Interdisciplinarity Measurement in Publications:From Full Reference Analysis to Sectional Reference Analysis |
| |
| Zhang Lin,Liu Dongdong,Lyu Qi,Sun Beibei,Huang Ying.Interdisciplinarity Measurement in Publications:From Full Reference Analysis to Sectional Reference Analysis[J].Journal of the China Society for Scientific andTechnical Information,2020,39(5):492-499. |
| |
| Authors: | Zhang Lin Liu Dongdong Lyu Qi Sun Beibei Huang Ying |
| |
| Institution: | (Department of Management and Economics,North China University of Water Resource and Electric Power,Zhengzhou 450046;School of Information Management,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072;Centre for R&D Monitoring(ECOOM)and Department of MSI,KU Leuven,Leuven B-3000) |
| |
| Abstract: | Quantitative measurement of interdisciplinarity of relevant research outputs is an important issue in interdisciplinary research(IDR),and is of great significance for detecting and understanding the interdisciplinary phenomenon and the law of discipline development.Diversity measurement based on cited references is a mainstream method of interdisciplinarity measurement.However,most previous studies treated all the references of the paper as a whole while applying interdisciplinarity measures and ignored the distribution of references in separate sections,the importance of different references,and the repetition of some citations.This study first analyzes the cited references in different sections by identifying the citation marking,then calculates the weighted interdisciplinarity according to the importance of different sections by detecting reference distribution in sections.Taking the scientific papers published in PLoS ONE during 2007-2016 as an example,we come to the following conclusions:First,the Introduction section has the highest interdisciplinary diversity on average,followed by Discussion,Method,and Results;second,compared with the previous approach,measuring weighted interdisciplinarity based on the occurrence of cited references in different sections shows relatively low values and a more concentrated distribution.Our proposed approach presents the potential for a deeper and more detailed interdisciplinarity measurement and provides a new perspective on measuring and identifying interdisciplinary outputs. |
| |
| Keywords: | interdisciplinary research full-text analysis citation analysis citation annotation weighted measurement |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
