| 学术期刊多属性评价结果的实际差距研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 俞立平,潘云涛,武夷山.学术期刊多属性评价结果的实际差距研究[J].情报学报,2011,30(4). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 俞立平 潘云涛 武夷山 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 宁波大学商学院,宁波,315211
2. 中国科学技术信息研究所,北京,100038 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70973118); ISTIC-THOMSON科学计量学联合实验室开放基金项目(IT2009001) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 为了深入分析非线性评价带来的评价结果实际差距扭曲问题,本文采用回归分析法将非线性评价转换为线性评价并进行深入分析。研究结果表明,不同评价方法评价结果的用途不同,基于排序的评价其结果不能进行差距比较,线性评价在不同分值情况下改进难度不一样,非线性评价会带来评价对象实际差距的数据扭曲;TOPSIS法是一种惩罚落后,略微鼓励先进的评价方法;灰色关联法是一种防止骄傲,帮助落后的评价方法;在竞争中,期刊必须认识到非线性评价所带来的与竞争对手差距扭曲问题,从而明确差距,进行改进。
|
| 关 键 词： | 学术期刊 多属性评价 非线性评价 实际差距 |
Study on Disparity of Academic Journal Assessment by Multiple Attribute Evaluation |
| |
| Yu Liping,Pan Yuntao,Wu Yishan.Study on Disparity of Academic Journal Assessment by Multiple Attribute Evaluation[J].Journal of the China Society for Scientific andTechnical Information,2011,30(4). |
| |
| Authors: | Yu Liping Pan Yuntao Wu Yishan |
| |
| Institution: | Yu Liping~1,Pan Yuntao~2 and Wu Yishan~2 (1.Business School,Ningbo University,Ningbo 315211,2.Institute of Scientific and Technical information of China,Beijing 100038) |
| |
| Abstract: | This paper changes nonlinear evaluation to linear evaluation by regression in order to analyze realistic disparity tortuosity of nonlinear evaluation.The results show that different evaluation methods' usage isn't the same.The results based on ranking can' t be compared.Linear evaluation' s improvement is different at different score and nonlinear evaluation may cause evaluation results' tortuosity.TOPSIS may encourage excellent and discourage lagging behind.Gray relation analysis may discourage excellent a... |
| |
| Keywords: | academic journal multiple attribute evaluation nonlinear evaluation realistic disparity |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
