| 为“浅阅读”与“功利性阅读”再辩 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 董一凡.为“浅阅读”与“功利性阅读”再辩[J].图书馆建设,2010(2). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 董一凡 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 福建师范大学社会历史学院; |
| |
| 摘 要： | 近一年来,图书馆界关于浅阅读与功利性阅读问题的研究已渐渐引起争议。在探讨过程中,学者们忽视了这两种阅读方式在推进社会进步、开发智力资源、加速人才培养、增强悦读情趣等方面的社会功能;忽视了它们是当代读者最常见的、最有效的阅读方式和正常的阅读习惯。因此,图书馆应该坚持客观公正的态度,对其尊重、肯定、引导。
|
| 关 键 词： | 浅阅读 功利性阅读 读者 图书馆 |
Argument of Shallow Reading and Utilitarian Reading |
| |
| Abstract: | The research on shallow reading and utilitarian reading has become very controversial in librarianship in recent one year. In process of discussion, scholars ignore the social functions of shallow reading and utilitarian reading in moving forward the process of society, developing intellectual resources, accelerating the cultivation of talented people, enhancing fun of reading, and scholars also ignore that shallow reading and utilitarian reading are the most common and effective reading way and normal habi... |
| |
| Keywords: | Shallow reading Utilitarian reading Reader Library |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
