| 中美原始法律文献公开获取比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 袁晔.中美原始法律文献公开获取比较研究[J].图书馆建设,2011(11):45-48. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 袁晔 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 上海交通大学图书馆,上海,200240 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 原始法律文献是最重要的法律信息，实现原始法律文献的公开获取对于保障公民基本权利具有重要意义。美国在原始法律文献公开获取的制度保障和实践操作方面已形成一套较完善的体系，相比较而言，我国原始法律文献公开获取面临着信息公开制度基础薄弱、缺乏权威汇编机构、公共获取不够便捷等诸多问题，应当制定有效政策确立各级机构的信息公开义务，建立全国统一的法律信息公开标准，并充分发挥图书馆的法律知识传播作用。
|
| 关 键 词： | 原始法律文献 公开获取 信息公开 |
Comparison Research on Open Access of Primary Legal Documents in the US and China |
| |
| Abstract: | Primary legal documents are the most important legal information.There are many successful experiences in the practice of open access of primary legal documents.The US has already formed a perfect system in the institution guarantee and practical operation of open access of primary legal documents.In comparison,open access of primary legal documents for public in China is facing lots of problems,such as the weak information opening system,lack of authority assembly institutions and inconvenient public acces... |
| |
| Keywords: | Primary legal document Open access Information opening |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
