Communication Forms as Predictors of Issue Knowledge in Presidential Campaigns: A Meta-Analytic Assessment |
| |
| Authors: | Glenn J Hansen William L Benoit |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Communication , University of Oklahoma;2. Department of Communication , University of Missouri—Columbia |
| |
| Abstract: | Theory and past research argue for the importance of understanding the effect of various campaign communication forms (e.g., newspapers, television news, radio, debates, candidate advertising, and personal discussions) on levels of issue knowledge (IK). This study used a meta-analytic approach to examine how well these forms predict IK. The aggregate analysis indicates that any of these forms can affect IK but that the different forms are not equally successful. Findings also indicate that the level of campaign interest moderates the effect of reading newspapers and watching television news and that those who watch debates in years with incumbents are less likely to learn. In addition, studies of newspapers are less likely to find significant effects in recent years, even though the issue content of newspapers has increased. The findings also suggest that television news is more likely to influence IK when levels of issue content are greater. These data indicate that measures of media use and IK can systematically influence the study results. Several conclusions are drawn from the research in the hopes of moving toward a theoretical model of communication forms and the attainment of IK. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
