| 规范使用SCI下科技评价的问题与解决路径研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 俞立平.规范使用SCI下科技评价的问题与解决路径研究[J].情报资料工作,2020,41(2):64-69. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 俞立平 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 浙江工商大学统计与数学学院 杭州 310018 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社科基金项目“学术评价与创新绩效评价问题研究”(项目编号:19FTQB011);浙江省一流学科A类项目(浙江工商大学统计学,管理科学与工程)的研究成果。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的/意义]教育部、科技部2020年发布了《关于规范高等学校SCI论文相关指标使用树立正确评价导向的若干意见》,对意见推广后可能存在的问题进行深度分析并提出改进思路具有重要意义。方法/过程]本文从评价对象、评价方法、评价目的、评价管理等方面进行分析,对规范使用SCI论文评价的适用范围与存在问题进行探讨。结果/结论]研究发现,规范使用SCI存在少部分SCI期刊质量不高、SCI论文只适用于微观评价、代表作“代表性”不够、数量指标与质量指标难以兼顾、评价管理有待改进等等问题。提出了如下政策建议:以高水平SCI期刊作为评价依据;强化黑名单制度;宏观评价要发挥SCI论文的主导作用;鼓励采用一些文献计量指标进行评价;微观评价建议兼顾代表作与SCI论文数量;一般高校对研究生毕业论文应该有所要求。最后指出,SCI论文的规范应用需要深化高校科技管理体制改革;解决SCI论文的评价问题需要循序渐进;要重视SCI论文的科研符号功能。
|
| 关 键 词： | SCI论文 科技评价问题 四唯 文献计量 |
A Probe into the Problems and Solutions of Scientific Research Evaluation under Standard Use of SCI |
| |
| Yu Liping.A Probe into the Problems and Solutions of Scientific Research Evaluation under Standard Use of SCI[J].Information and Documentation Services,2020,41(2):64-69. |
| |
| Authors: | Yu Liping |
| |
| Institution: | (School of Statistics and Mathematics,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou,310018) |
| |
| Abstract: | Purpose/significance]In 2020,the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Science and Technol zogy is sued several opinions on regulating the use of indicators related to SCI papers in colleges and universities and establish ing a correct evaluation orientation,which is of great significance to make in-depth analysis of the problems that may exist and put forward the improvement ideas after the opinions are promoted.Method/process]This paper analyzes the evaluation object,evaluation method,evaluation purpose,evaluation management,etc.,and discusses the applica ble scope and existing problems of standardizing the use of SCI paper evaluation.Result/conclusion]This paper finds that there are some problems in the standardized use of SCI,such as the low quality of a few SCI journals,the applicabil ity of SCI papers only to micro evaluation,the lack of"representativeness"of representative works,the difficulty in tak ing both quantitative and quality indicators into account,and the evaluation management to be improved.This paper puts forward the following policy suggestions:High level SCI journals should be used as evaluation basis.Blacklist sys tem should be strengthened.The leading role of SCI papers should be brought into play in macro evaluation.The use of bibliometric indicators for evaluation should be encouraged.Consideration should be given to both the number of repre sentative works and SCI papers in micro evaluation.Dissertations should be required in general university.Finally,this paper points out that the standardized application of SCI papers needs to deepen the reform of scientific and technologi cal management system in colleges and universities,the solution of the evaluation problem of SCI papers should be tak en step by step,and the scientific research symbol function of SCI papers should be taken seriously. |
| |
| Keywords: | SCI papers scientific evaluation problems four sole criterions bibliometric |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
