首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基础理论视角下的科研评价思考
引用本文:付慧真,张琳,胡志刚,侯剑华,李江.基础理论视角下的科研评价思考[J].情报资料工作,2020,41(2):31-37.
作者姓名:付慧真  张琳  胡志刚  侯剑华  李江
作者单位:浙江大学公共管理学院 杭州310058;武汉大学信息管理学院 湖北430072;大连理工大学科学学与科技管理研究所 辽宁116024;中山大学资讯管理学院 广州510006;南京大学信息管理学院 江苏210023
摘    要:目的/意义]科研评价是科研管理的有效手段,但科研评价的具体实施常常备受争议。明晰科研评价的基础理论,有利于评价者与被评价者在实际应用中透彻理解与正确采用恰当的工具与方法,促进科研评价的良性循环。方法/过程]本文将结合科学计量学、科学学等研究领域的基础理论,从科学的发展、同行评议制度、代表作评价制度、定量评价的常见误区、传统文献检索系统的转型五个方面阐述对科研评价的思考。结果/结论]事实证明,科学计量学、科学学等领域的基础理论已经并将继续为科研评价体系的完善与落实发挥重要支撑作用。

关 键 词:科学计量学  科学学开放科学  同行评议  代表作评价  文献评价系统

Reflection on Scientific Evaluation from the Perspective of Basic Theory
Fu Huizhen,Zhang Lin,Hu Zhigang,Hou Jianhua,Li Jiang.Reflection on Scientific Evaluation from the Perspective of Basic Theory[J].Information and Documentation Services,2020,41(2):31-37.
Authors:Fu Huizhen  Zhang Lin  Hu Zhigang  Hou Jianhua  Li Jiang
Institution:(School of Public Affairs,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou,310058;School of Information Management,Wuhan University,Hubei,430072;WISELab,Dalian University of Technology,Liaoning,116024;School of Information Management,Sun Yat-Sen University,Guangzhou,510006;School of Information Management,Nanjing University,Jiangsu,210023)
Abstract:Purpose/significance]The research assessmentis considered as an effective means of research manage ment,but its implementationis usually controversial.Clarification of research assessment from a basic theory perspec tive could help the evaluatorsand researchers well interpret and wisely employ appropriate indicators and tools in prac tice,fostering a virtuous circle for research assessment.Method/process]This paper aimed atclarifyingthe reflections of research assessmentfrom five aspects:development of science,peer review,review of representative works,common misunderstandingsabout quantitative evaluation,and transformation of traditional literature retrieval system,based on the basic theoriesinresearch fields of scientometrics and science of science.Result/conclusion]Itisthetruththatbasic theoriesinscientometrics and science of science fields have played and will continue to play an important supporting role in the improvement and implementation of research assessment.
Keywords:scientometrics science of science  open science  peer review  review of representative works  literature evaluation system
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号