| 关于文科研究生"发文规定"是否合理的调查分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 叶继元.关于文科研究生"发文规定"是否合理的调查分析[J].图书与情报,2007(6):1-8,32. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 叶继元 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南京大学信息管理系,江苏南京,210093 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 为了解答研究生要获得学位必须在规定的期刊上正式发表论文的规定是否合理问题，文章归纳了正、反和折中的三种观点，详细调查、考证和统计了人文社科学术期刊数量、文科硕士生、博士生数量及每年可能的发文数量，分析了三种观点的利弊和大多数高校仍然没有取消这一规定的原因，认为硬性规定是不合理的，应该将学位与发表论文脱钩，鼓励、提倡及时将科研成果在学术期刊上发表，对确有水平的论文，不论发表期刊的档次如何，甚至是否公开发表，都可视为重要参考，但不能作为是否授予学位的唯一标准，应建立与完善学术评价体系，评价指标的设计要淡化论文数量要求，强化质量要求，完善人文社科学术期刊评价标准，明确各种期刊定位，加强期刊质量。
|
| 关 键 词： | 研究生 学位论文 期刊论文 学术评价 发表论文规定 |
| 文章编号： | 1003-6938（2007）06-0001-08 |
| 收稿时间： | 2007-09-22 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007-09-22 |
Investigation and Analysis of Rationality about "Regulations for Paper Publishing" of Arts Graduates |
| |
| Ye Jiyuan.Investigation and Analysis of Rationality about "Regulations for Paper Publishing" of Arts Graduates[J].Library and Information,2007(6):1-8,32. |
| |
| Authors: | Ye Jiyuan |
| |
| Institution: | Information Management Department of Nanjing University,Nanjing,Jiangsu,210093 |
| |
| Abstract: | In order to answer the question of whether regulations for paper publishing of arts graduates is rationality, this paper summaries three kinds of views which are positive, negative and compromising respectively. And investigate, research and statistic the number of arts academic periodical arts master and doctor and paper publishing possible every year. Then analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of three views and the reason colleges and universities keep the regulations, This paper considers that the regulations for paper publishing of arts graduates is unreasonable and put forwards some advices in the end. |
| |
| Keywords: | graduate degree thesis periodical paper academic appraisal regulations for paper publishing |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
