| Google scholar对文摘数据库的冲击 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张宇娥,刘静,李世兰.Google scholar对文摘数据库的冲击[J].四川图书馆学报,2011(3):60-62. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张宇娥 刘静 李世兰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 电子科技大学,图书馆,四川成都,610054 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 文摘数据库以其收录信息全、检索功能强、全文链接、定题跟踪等优势,被图书馆界公认为是系统检索科研信息的首选检索工具,但科研人员却更多地选择Google scholar。文章从信息来源、检索功能等方面对比Googlescholar与文摘数据库,认为文摘数据库仍是系统检索科研信息的首选检索工具,提出通过加强宣传文摘数据库、完善馆藏链接与全文链接、整合电子资源等方式,使更多的科研人员选择文摘数据库。
|
| 关 键 词： | Googlescholar 文摘数据库 对比分析 检索功能 |
The Impact of Google Scholar on Database of Abstracts |
| |
| ZHANG Yu-e,LIU Jing,LI Shi- lan.The Impact of Google Scholar on Database of Abstracts[J].Journal of The Sichuan Society for Library Science,2011(3):60-62. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Yu-e LIU Jing LI Shi- lan |
| |
| Institution: | ZHANG Yu-e,LIU Jing,LI Shi-lan(Library,University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,Chengdu 610054,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Abstracts database has been recognized as the preferred tool of information search,but researchers choose Google scholar than abstracts database.By comparing Google scholar with abstracts database from information sources and search function,the authors think that the abstracts database is still the preferred tool of information search.Abstract database will be used by more researchers by strengthening publicity,improving the link of library holding and full text and integrating the electronic resources,etc... |
| |
| Keywords: | Google scholar abstract database comparative analysis search function |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
