| 严格审查修改说明是保证论文学术质量的重要环节 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王蕾.严格审查修改说明是保证论文学术质量的重要环节[J].编辑学报,2014,26(1):37-39. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王蕾 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 国家气象中心《气象》编辑部; |
| |
| 摘 要： | 修改说明是稿件退修过程中作者对审稿意见的回复,是作者行使知情权、参与权、表达权(申诉权、话语权)和监督权的体现;因此是编辑质量控制流程中不可忽视的一个环节。本文针对科技论文中作者对修改说明重视不够,存在敷衍搪塞、避而不答或答非所问的一些现象,提出了改进措施并阐述了编辑在质量控制中的意义和作用。
|
| 关 键 词： | 科技期刊 稿件退改 修改说明 质量控制 严格审查 |
| 收稿时间： | 2013/5/23 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2013/5/23 0:00:00 |
Carefully checking authors' response to reviewers' comments:a crucial measure to ensure the quality of sci-tech journals |
| |
| WANG Lei.Carefully checking authors'' response to reviewers'' comments:a crucial measure to ensure the quality of sci-tech journals[J].Acta Editologica,2014,26(1):37-39. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Lei |
| |
| Institution: | Editorial Department of Meteorological Monthly, National Meteorological Centre, CMA, 100081, Beijing, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Authors'' response to reviewers'' comments is authors'' answer to reviewer''s suggestions, questions or criticisms, and is the reflection of authors'' right to know, rights of participation, expression and supervision. Therefore, it cannot be ignored in the course of journal quality control. A lot of authors cannot attach enough importance to their response to reviewers'' comments, often prevaricating, avoiding questions, or even giving irrelevant answers. In this paper, some measures are proposed targeting these phenomena, and editor''s role in is also discussesed controlling the quality of sci-tech journals. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
