首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

对某课题组所发表系列论文中“假引”现象的思考
引用本文:王福军,冷怀明,郭建秀.对某课题组所发表系列论文中“假引”现象的思考[J].编辑学报,2011,23(4):308-310.
作者姓名:王福军  冷怀明  郭建秀
作者单位:《遵义医学院学报》编辑部,贵州遵义,563003;《第三军医大学学报》编辑部,重庆,400038
摘    要:通过对某课题组所发表系列论文中“假引”现象的分析,阐述以期刊影响因子作为单篇论文学术质量评价指标的局限性及正确认识“假引”现象对单篇论文学术质量评价的意义。认为对于单篇论文应运用期刊影响因子、总被引频次并结合同行评议及论文的社会价值等进行综合评价,并应采取相应的措施减少甚至杜绝“假引”问题。

关 键 词:假引  期刊影响因子  单篇论文  学术质量  应对措施
收稿时间:2011/1/11 0:00:00
修稿时间:2011/1/11 0:00:00

Thoughts on "false citations" among a series of published articles by a research group
WANG Fujun,LENG Huaiming and GUO Jianxiu.Thoughts on "false citations" among a series of published articles by a research group[J].Acta Editologica,2011,23(4):308-310.
Authors:WANG Fujun  LENG Huaiming and GUO Jianxiu
Institution:Editorial Department of Acta Academiae Medicinae Zunyi,563003,Zunyi,Guizhou,China
Abstract:Through analyzing some "false citations" among a series of articles published by a research group,we elaborates the limitations of impact factor as it has been used to evaluate the academic quality of a single article,and identify the role of "false citation" in this evaluation.We advocate that we need to make a comprehensive analysis to evaluate the academic quality of a single article,including impact factor,total citation of the journal,comments from peer reviewers,and its social values.We hope that we should understand the role of impact factor in evaluating academic quality of a single article,and thus take some measures to reduce and even to put an end of false citation.
Keywords:false citation  impact factor of periodical  single article  academic quality  measure
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《编辑学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《编辑学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号