首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

从责任编辑视角谈科技期刊学术不端检测系统的使用
引用本文:柯文辉,林海清,张梅,翁志辉.从责任编辑视角谈科技期刊学术不端检测系统的使用[J].编辑学报,2013,25(3):276-278.
作者姓名:柯文辉  林海清  张梅  翁志辉
作者单位:《福建农业学报》编辑部,350003,福州
摘    要:针对目前使用的科技期刊学术不端检测系统(AM-LC),从责任编辑的视角,根据使用AMLC的经验,分析AMLC的使用对责任编辑工作"微环境"的若干影响,并建议建立小同行专家评审制度、编委成员"共享"审查制度、同行编辑部间的"防范"联结机制,以克服AMLC的局限性,遏制学术不端。提出了完善AMLC的若干建议。

关 键 词:编辑视角  科技期刊  学术不端  科技期刊学术不端检测系统
收稿时间:2012/7/7 0:00:00
修稿时间:2012/7/7 0:00:00

Review on the usage of Academic Misconduct Literature Check from the responsible editor's perspective
KE Wenhui,LIN Haiqing,ZHANG Mei and WENG Zhihui.Review on the usage of Academic Misconduct Literature Check from the responsible editor''s perspective[J].Acta Editologica,2013,25(3):276-278.
Authors:KE Wenhui  LIN Haiqing  ZHANG Mei and WENG Zhihui
Institution:Editorial Office of Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,350003,Fuzhou,Fujian,China
Abstract:On the basis of the detection range and style of the Academic Misconduct Literature Check (AMLC), and the feedback from responsible editors, the article is aimed to evaluate the limitations of AMLC from an editor''s perspective. Presumably, it will be very effective to inhibit academic misconduct if introducing peer review system in a small range, shared editorial board and combined precaution among editorial departments of sci-tech periodicals. Some suggestions are put forward for the complement of AMLC finally. Keywords\ editor''s perspective; sci-tech periodicals; academic misconduct; AMLC
Keywords:editor's perspective  sci-tech periodicals  academic misconduct  AMLC
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《编辑学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《编辑学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号