| 科技期刊同行评审专家与编辑的博弈 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 周沫,王维朗.科技期刊同行评审专家与编辑的博弈[J].编辑学报,2013,25(3):214-215. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 周沫 王维朗 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 重庆大学期刊社,400030,重庆 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 中国高校科技期刊研究会基金重点资助项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 为了正确认识评审专家与编辑的关系,提升科技期刊的学术质量,通过对评审专家与编辑在同行评议中作用的分析,阐述评审专家与编辑的博弈关系。认为:审稿专家与编辑之间是合作不是替代,是制约不是对立,两者在博弈中的合作与制约可有效发挥同行评议的作用,最终提高科技期刊质量。
|
| 关 键 词： | 科技期刊 同行评议 评审专家 编辑 |
| 收稿时间： | 2012/11/1 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2012/11/1 0:00:00 |
Relationship between peer-reviewer and editor in the peer review process of sci-tech journals |
| |
| ZHOU Mo and WANG Weilang.Relationship between peer-reviewer and editor in the peer review process of sci-tech journals[J].Acta Editologica,2013,25(3):214-215. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHOU Mo and WANG Weilang |
| |
| Institution: | Journals Department,Chongqing University,400030,Chongqing,China |
| |
| Abstract: | To correctly understand the relationship between peer-reviewer and editor, and improve the academic quality of sci-tech journals, this article analyzes the roles of peer-reviewer and editor in the peer review process, and elaborates the game relationship between them. It is thought that the relationship between peer-reviewer and editor is cooperation rather than substitution, is restraint but not opposition, and the game between the peer-reviewer and editor could make peer-review more effective,and improve the quality of sci-tech journals. |
| |
| Keywords: | sci-tech journal peer review peer-reviewer editor |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
