| 研究性论文的结尾应是"结论"而非"讨论" |
| |
| 引用本文： | 朱大明.研究性论文的结尾应是"结论"而非"讨论"[J].编辑学报,2006,18(5):347-348. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 朱大明 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 防护工程编辑部,471023,河南洛阳 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 针对某些科技期刊(如医学、生物学等期刊)研究性论文的结尾普遍采用"讨论"而不是"结论"的现象,对"讨论"与"结论"的概念及内容进行对比分析,并指出:在一般情况下研究性论文的结尾应该是"结论"而非"讨论".
|
| 关 键 词： | 研究性论文 论文结尾 "讨论" "结论" 研究性论文 情况 分析 现象 科技期刊 生物学 医学 |
| 收稿时间： | 2006-01-13 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-02-17 |
Ending of research papers should be "conclusions" but not "discussions" |
| |
| Zhu Daming.Ending of research papers should be "conclusions" but not "discussions"[J].Acta Editologica,2006,18(5):347-348. |
| |
| Authors: | Zhu Daming |
| |
| Institution: | Editorial Department of Protective Engineering, 471023, Luoyang, Henan, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Aiming at the phenomenon that the endings of research papers in sci-tech periodicals such as medical and biological journals are "discussions" but not "conclusions",this paper makes comparative analyses on the concepts and contents of "discussion" and "conclusion",and points out that the endings of research papers should be "conclusions" but not "discussions". |
| |
| Keywords: | research paper ending of papers "discussion" "conclusion" |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
