| 关于科技期刊编辑质量考核的思考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黄政,郝希春.关于科技期刊编辑质量考核的思考[J].编辑学报,2011,23(4):291-293. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黄政 郝希春 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国基层医药杂志社,安徽淮南市,232001 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 科技期刊编辑质量直接影响刊物的整体质量。而在考核科技期刊的编辑质量时，SCI情结很易导致原本客观公正的评价指标失去其实际评价功能和意义。正因为科技期刊编辑的贡献更多地表现为隐性成绩，对特殊性和复杂性极为明显的科技期刊编辑质量考评在理论上和实践中都有待不断深化。
|
| 关 键 词： | 科技期刊 编辑质量 考核 学者编辑化 编辑学者化 科学引文索引 |
| 收稿时间： | 2010/12/10 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2010/12/10 0:00:00 |
Thinking of assessment of editing quality of scientific journals |
| |
| HUANG Zheng and HAO Xichun.Thinking of assessment of editing quality of scientific journals[J].Acta Editologica,2011,23(4):291-293. |
| |
| Authors: | HUANG Zheng and HAO Xichun |
| |
| Institution: | HUANG Zheng,HAO Xichun Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy,232001,Huainan,Anhui,China |
| |
| Abstract: | The editing quality directly affects the overall quality of scientific journals.The quality of editors and the quality of papers in the journals are golden standards for the assessment.Therefore,publishing high quality journals requires scientists to become editors.In assessing the editing quality of scientific journals,the motivation of being indexed in SCI will easily make the originally objective and fair assessment indicators lose their practical functions.Because in many cases the contribution of the editors looks like some recessive achievements,so for the editing quality of scientific journals which is very particular and complicated,its assessment needs more theoretical studies and real practices. |
| |
| Keywords: | scientific journal scientific paper editing quality assessment "scientists to be editors" "editors to be scientists" Science Citation Index |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
