| 健全科学技术评判体系 提高科技期刊编审质量 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 何先刚,代金平.健全科学技术评判体系 提高科技期刊编审质量[J].编辑学报,2008,20(1):10-12. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 何先刚 代金平 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 重庆邮电大学学报编辑部,400065,重庆;重庆邮电大学学报编辑部,400065,重庆 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 中国高校人文社科学报学会课题
,
中国高等学校自然科学学报研究会课题
,
重庆市信息产业发展政策研究项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对科学技术的评判应包括真理评判、价值评判和美学评判.这3种评判相互关联,由此构成了科学技术的评判体系.为提高科技期刊的编审质量,编审人员必须在实践中贯彻这一评判体系,以体现科技期刊的人文关怀属性.
|
| 关 键 词： | 科学技术 评判体系 人文关怀 编审质量 |
| 收稿时间： | 2007-09-18 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007-10-20 |
Perfecting the evaluation system of science and technology and improving the edi ting quality for sci-tech journals |
| |
| HE Xiangang and DAI Jinping.Perfecting the evaluation system of science and technology and improving the edi ting quality for sci-tech journals[J].Acta Editologica,2008,20(1):10-12. |
| |
| Authors: | HE Xiangang and DAI Jinping |
| |
| Institution: | Editorial Board of Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunicatio ns, 400065, Chongqing, China and Editorial Board of Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunicatio ns, 400065, Chongqing, China |
| |
| Abstract: | The evaluation on science and technology must include the truth evaluation, value evaluation and aesthetic evaluation. These evaluations are interrelated and constitute the evaluation system for science and technology. For completely improving the editing quality of sci-tech journals, the editors must carry out this evaluation system in practiceto present the humanistic care of scitech journals. |
| |
| Keywords: | science and technology evaluation system humanistic care editing quality |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
