| 人文社会科学研究成果评价:科学性、创新性与价值性及其关系 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 任全娥.人文社会科学研究成果评价:科学性、创新性与价值性及其关系[J].评价与管理,2009(1). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 任全娥 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国社会科学院文献计量与科学评价研究中心; |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在人文社会科学研究成果的评价标准中,创新思想是评价的核心指标,研究规范是评价的基础指标,学术价值与社会价值则是评价的重要指标。研究规范是科研成果科学性的保障,研究方法规范化不代表成果的创新性。学术价值或社会价值是社会科学研究成果评价的终点,也是创新性科学研究成果产生的起点。静态意义上,创新始于科学终于价值,动态意义上,则创新始于价值又终于价值。
|
| 关 键 词： | 人文社会科学 科研评价 科学性 创新性 价值性 |
Research on Outcome of Evaluation of Humanities and Social Science:Scientificity,Innovation,Valuable and their Relationships |
| |
| REN Quan-e.Research on Outcome of Evaluation of Humanities and Social Science:Scientificity,Innovation,Valuable and their Relationships[J].Evaluation & Management,2009(1). |
| |
| Authors: | REN Quan-e |
| |
| Abstract: | In the outcome of research evaluation criteria of Humanities and Social Science,innovative idea is the core indicator,normative study is the basic indicator,academic value and social value are the key indicators.Normative study ensures research outcome's scientificity,while standardization of research methods does not mean that the outcome is innovative.Academic value or social value is the ultimate goal of evaluation of Humanities and Social Science,and the cradle of innovative scientific research achievem... |
| |
| Keywords: | Humanity and social science Scientific evaluation Scientificity Innovation Valuable |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
