| TWCNCI:一种考虑加权引文时间窗口的学科标准化新指标研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王兴,张志辉.TWCNCI:一种考虑加权引文时间窗口的学科标准化新指标研究[J].图书情报工作,2022,66(5):116-124. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王兴 张志辉 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 山西财经大学信息学院 太原 030006;2. 同方知网(北京)技术有限公司 北京 100192 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的/意义] 科研评价中,短时间引文窗口下的学科标准化指标往往是不可靠的,因为这时论文发表的时间较短,还没有充足的时间获取被引次数。然而,各种标准化方法本身并不能解决这一问题。研究旨在解决这一科研评价中的难题。方法/过程] 研究引入一个权重因素以表示每篇论文标准分的可靠程度,权重由论文在给定的短时间窗口下的被引次数与长时间窗口下被引次数的相关系数计算获得,论文发表时间越短(长),可靠性越低(高),权重也越低(高)。为验证加权效果,将权重与常用的学科标准化指标CNCI进行加权处理,计算世界500强大学每所大学所有论文加权后的总影响力TWCNCI值与未加权时的总影响力TCNCI值。结果/结论] 研究发现,500强大学的TWCNCI值与TCNCI值,TWCNCI的排名与TCNCI的排名都具有极强的相关性,但是仍有部分大学在加权后排名发生明显波动。据此,研究认为标准化指标在短时间窗口下不可靠的弊端以及对此修正的权重因素在科研评价中不应忽视。
|
| 关 键 词： | 引文时间窗口 学科标准化 CNCI TWCNCI 科研评价 皇冠指标 |
| 收稿时间： | 2021-08-09 |
| 修稿时间： | 2021-10-07 |
TWCNCI:Research on a New Indicator of Field Normalization Considering Weighted Citation Time Window |
| |
| Wang Xing,Zhang Zhihui.TWCNCI:Research on a New Indicator of Field Normalization Considering Weighted Citation Time Window[J].Library and Information Service,2022,66(5):116-124. |
| |
| Authors: | Wang Xing Zhang Zhihui |
| |
| Institution: | 1. School of Information, Shanxi University of Finance & Economics, Taiyuan 030006;2. Tongfang Knowledge Network Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100192 |
| |
| Abstract: | Purpose/significance] In the research evaluation, the field normalization indicator may not be sufficiently reliable when a short citation time window is used, because the publication time of the paper is shorter at this time, recent publications usually have insufficient time to accumulate the number of citations. However, all kinds of normalization methods themselves cannot solve this problem. Method/process] This paper introduced a weighting factor representing the degree of reliability of the normalization citation count of one paper, which was calculated as the correlation coefficient between citation count of papers in the given short time window and those in the long time window. To verify the effect of the weighting, this paper introduced the weighting factor to weight the commonly used normalization indicator CNCI at the paper level and then computed the weighted total influence TWCNCI value and the unweighted total influence TCNCI value (Total CNCI) of all papers of each of the world’s top 500 universities. Result/conclusion] The results show that although there was a strong correlation between the TWCNCI value and the TCNCI value and the rankings under TWCNCI and TCNCI of the world’s top 500 universities, some universities’ rankings have still changed significantly after weighting. This research demonstrates that the shortcomings of normalization indicators that are unreliable in a short time window and the weighting factors for this correction should not be ignored in the scientific research evaluation practices. |
| |
| Keywords: | citation time window field normalization CNCI TWCNCI scientific research evaluation crown indicator |
|
| 点击此处可从《图书情报工作》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《图书情报工作》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
