| 两类学术评价指标比较研究——以影响因子和谷歌学术指标期刊评价为观察视角 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 许广奎,涂志芳.两类学术评价指标比较研究——以影响因子和谷歌学术指标期刊评价为观察视角[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(3):109-117. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 许广奎 涂志芳 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 烟台大学图书馆 烟台 264005;2. 北京大学信息管理系 北京 100871 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的/意义]学术评价对整个学术生态系统的发展具有重要意义。以影响因子和谷歌学术指标为视角，跟踪国内外学术评价指标发展的新动态，思考和探索学术评价指标优化发展的可能方向。方法/过程]分别选取h5指数排名前50的中英文出版物并查询对应影响因子，分析并检验h5指数与影响因子的关系；对比中英文出版物在学科分布、时间范围、"被引"统计标准等方面的异同和优缺点，总结学术评价指标应考虑的诸多因素。从评价主体、评价对象等维度对网络环境下新的学术评价方式进行探索，对Altmetrics、RCR、PubPeer的创新性学术评价实践进行案例分析。结果/结论]学术评价体系系统而复杂，与学术出版、交流与传播、保存利用等各环节密切关联，科学合理的评价体系应平衡数量与质量、保持客观中立、兼顾内容与形式，应分层次、多维度、全方位进行学术评价。
|
| 关 键 词： | 学术评价指标 谷歌学术指标 h指数 h5指数 影响因子 |
| 收稿时间： | 2016-11-04 |
Comparative Research on Two Scholar Metrics: From the Perspectives of Journal Impact Factors and Google Scholar Metrics |
| |
| Xu Guangkui,Tu Zhifang.Comparative Research on Two Scholar Metrics: From the Perspectives of Journal Impact Factors and Google Scholar Metrics[J].Library and Information Service,2017,61(3):109-117. |
| |
| Authors: | Xu Guangkui Tu Zhifang |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Library of YanTai University, Yantai 264005;2. Department of Information Management of Peking University, Beijing 100871 |
| |
| Abstract: | Purpose/significance] The academic assessment is of great significance to the academic ecosystem. From the perspectives of impact factors and Google scholar metrics, this paper aims at tracking the trends of the scholar metrics at home and abroad and discussing its possible directions of optimization.Method/process] This paper firstly selected the top 50 Chinese and English publications ranked by h5-index and inquired their corresponding impact factors, analyzed and verified the relationship between h5-index and impact factors. Comparing the similarities, differences, advantages and disadvantages of Chinese and English publications in terms of discipline distribution, time coverage and statistical standards, this paper summarized the elements that should be considered in scholar metrics. Exploring new methods of scholar metrics from the dimension of subject and object under the network environment, this paper made the case study of Altmetrics, RCR, and PubPeer for their innovative scholar metrics practices.Result/conclusion] The scholar metric is systematic and comprehensive, having strong association with scholarly publishing, communication, storage and usage. Scientific and rational scholar metrics are expected to be able to balance the quantity and quality, contents and forms of academic achievements and stand on a neutral side as well. Eventually, assessing the journals and individual researchers should be from multiple levels, multiple dimensions and all rounds. |
| |
| Keywords: | scholar metric Google scholar metric h-index h5 index impact factor |
|
| 点击此处可从《图书情报工作》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《图书情报工作》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
