| 多源数据的期刊复合引文分析均值方法探析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 苏林伟,于霜,许鑫,赵星.多源数据的期刊复合引文分析均值方法探析[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(19):100-107. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 苏林伟 于霜 许鑫 赵星 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 华东师范大学商学院信息学系 上海 200241;
2. 中国科学技术信息研究所 北京 100038 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 本文系ISTIC-ELSEVIER期刊评价研究中心开放基金资助项目"基于Scopus、GS与WoS多源数据的期刊复合引文分析方法研究"研究成果之一。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的/意义] 鉴于Scopus、Web of Science(WoS)与Google Scholar(GS)3个单源数据库在计量学研究和应用中的局限,发展综合利用多源数据信息的复合型引文分析方法可为计量学分析提供一种补充思路。方法/过程] 以期刊总被引次数这一底层参量为切入点,用图书情报学国际期刊2009-2014年数据为实证基础,尝试对多源数据复合引文算术均值、几何均值及调和均值方法进行比较讨论。结果/结论] 结果发现,算术均值、几何均值和调和均值虽有差异,但亦有线性关联,应用中可选其一;累计算术均值、几何均值和调和均值与期刊数之间未证实存在布拉德福定律,但在期刊数量等同的三分区内,累计被引均值满足形如n2:n:1的经验分布;多源数据复合引文与单个数据库引文的期刊排名差异呈现"两端小、中间大"之现象;期刊的算术均值排名与GS排名结果更接近,几何均值排名则与Scopus相似度更高,而调和均值与WoS的排名差异最小。
|
| 关 键 词： | Scopus WoS Google Scholar 多源数据 复合引文分析 |
| 收稿时间： | 2015-08-03 |
Mean Algorithms for Composite Journal Citation Analysis Based on Multi-source Data |
| |
| Su Linwei,Yu Shuang,Xu Xin,Zhao Xing.Mean Algorithms for Composite Journal Citation Analysis Based on Multi-source Data[J].Library and Information Service,2015,59(19):100-107. |
| |
| Authors: | Su Linwei Yu Shuang Xu Xin Zhao Xing |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Business school, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241;
2. The Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China(ISTIC), Beijing 100038 |
| |
| Abstract: | Purpose/significance] As three single-source databases, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar all have limits in informetric researches and applications. The composite citation analysis method, which utilizes multi-source data, can provide a supplemental method. Method/process] Based on the journal's total citations and the cases of international LIS journals, this paper attempts to compare the mean algorithms of composite citation analysis, including arithmetic mean, geometric mean and harmonic mean. Result/conclusion] The results show that, though arithmetic mean is different from geometric mean or harmonic mean, there is a strong correlation between them. The cumulative arithmetic mean, cumulative geometric mean and harmonic mean do not follow Brad Ford's law, but with the same number of journals in three sub-zone, the cumulative value satisfies the model of "n2:n:1". The difference between journal rankings in single-source database and multi-source data appears as the phenomenon of "balance in ends, difference in mid". The journal ranking of arithmetic mean is closer to GS, while geometric mean is closer to Scopus and harmonic mean is closer to WoS. |
| |
| Keywords: | Scopus WoS Google Scholar Multi-source data Composite citation analysis |
|
| 点击此处可从《图书情报工作》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《图书情报工作》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
