首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

面向学术影响力评价的科技文献引用与下载的相关性研究
引用本文:曹艺,王曰芬,丁洁.面向学术影响力评价的科技文献引用与下载的相关性研究[J].图书情报工作,2012,56(8):56-64.
作者姓名:曹艺  王曰芬  丁洁
作者单位:南京理工大学经济管理学院
基金项目:国家大学生创新实验计划“网络环境下引文网络形成的机理与影响因素研究:基于知识转移的视角”;校级大学生科研训练计划“网络环境下文献下载与引文的交互作用及影响因素研究”研究成果之一
摘    要:源于对同一主体学术影响力评价的认识,新型的下载频次指标与当前主流的被引频次指标应具有内在的统一性,但用户认知水平和行为方式的不同以及引用和下载的不同决策模式及其在文献利用行为中的不同地位决定了两者的差异。基于CNKI期刊库,从论文、期刊和机构三个层次考察两种指标的分布状态,分析两者之关联乃至引用与下载的行为特点,研究下载频次所呈现的特征并与被引频次比较,以考察其作为评价指标的合理性和可用性。

关 键 词:被引频次  下载频次  相关性  
收稿时间:2011-10-24

Relativity Between Citation and Download Indicators of Scientific Papers for Academic Influence Evaluation
Cao Yi Wang Yuefen Ding Jie.Relativity Between Citation and Download Indicators of Scientific Papers for Academic Influence Evaluation[J].Library and Information Service,2012,56(8):56-64.
Authors:Cao Yi Wang Yuefen Ding Jie
Institution:School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology,
Abstract:The new type of download indicator and the mainly used citation indicator share some inner unity as they both evaluate a subject’s academic influence.However,different user cognition modes and behavior habits,along with the fact that citing and downloading behaviors display varied decision-making patterns,lead to the differences between the two types of indicators.Basing on CNKI journal database,this paper investigates the distribution and relativity between download and citation indicators on the level of paper,source journal and research institution,which illustrate characteristics of citation and download behaviors.By comparing the feature of download indicator and that of citation,it can find out whether the former can be taken as a reliable indicator for evaluation.
Keywords:citation indicator download indicator relativity
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《图书情报工作》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《图书情报工作》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号