| 基于学术社交网络的文献阅读及学科关注点差异研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 邓胜利,向阳.基于学术社交网络的文献阅读及学科关注点差异研究[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(6):99-106. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 邓胜利 向阳 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 武汉大学信息资源研究中心 武汉 430072 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 本文系教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"我国服务业信息化推进与保障机制研究"（项目编号：15JJD870001）和武汉大学"351人才计划项目"研究成果之一。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的/意义] 对不同学术社交网络中不同学科用户的文献阅读差异进行分析，以了解在不同学术社交网络中的学科分布情况，掌握在不同学术社交网络中的学科研究热点。方法/过程] 通过Altmetric. com获取24个学科的4 800篇热点文献，利用爬虫采集这些文献在Mendeley和ResearchGate的被阅读次数，再对文献进行内容分析，得到关键词，最后对比分析不同学术社交网络中文献阅读差异以及学科关注热点的一致性。结果/结论] 不同学科的读者身份、读者所属领域具有显著差异，ResearchGate中的文献阅读次数普遍高于Mendeley，且社会科学等软学科的文献阅读相对优势更为明显，而物理学等硬学科的文献阅读相对优势较低。Mendeley和ResearchGate在地球与地理科学、化学和环境科学等学科中的关注热点具有较高的一致性，而物理学等部分学科中的关注热点表现出较低的一致性。
|
| 关 键 词： | 学术社交网络 文献阅读 Mendeley ResearchGate |
| 收稿时间： | 2016-12-19 |
Research on the Differences of Literature Reading and Disciplinary Focus Based on Academic Social Networks |
| |
| Deng Shengli,Xiang Yang.Research on the Differences of Literature Reading and Disciplinary Focus Based on Academic Social Networks[J].Library and Information Service,2017,61(6):99-106. |
| |
| Authors: | Deng Shengli Xiang Yang |
| |
| Institution: | Center for Studies of Information Resources, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072 |
| |
| Abstract: | Purpose/significance] By analyzing the differences of the literature reading among different disciplines in different Academic Social Networks(ASNS), it is expected to help readers understand the distribution of subjects in different ASNS and master the research hotspots in different ASNS.Method/process] This paper collected 4 800 hot articles from 24 disciplines through Altmetric.com, used the crawler to collect the reading number in Mendeley and ResearchGate, and analyzed the literature to get the key words. Finally, this paper compared and analyzed the difference of literature reading and the consistency of hot spot in different ASNS.Result/conclusion] The results show that there are significant differences in the distribution of the readership and the subject. RG is more than Mendeley in the number of readings, and the Soft Subjects use RG more often than Mendeley, whereas the Hard Subjects use Mendeley and RG less different. On the other hand, different ASNS have different focus on different subjects which means that the more research fields in a subject, the more dispersed of the hot spots in different ASNS. |
| |
| Keywords: | academic social networks literature reading Mendeley ResearchGate |
|
| 点击此处可从《图书情报工作》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《图书情报工作》下载免费的PDF全文 |
