| 三种学术标签系统的比较分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李爱国.三种学术标签系统的比较分析[J].图书情报工作,2007,51(2):114-116. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李爱国 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 东南大学情报科学技术研究所 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 介绍RefWorks、Connotea和CiteULike三种学术标签系统的主要功能，比较分析三者之间的异同点。通过比较发现RefWorks是较好的书目信息创建工具，Connotea是组织参考文献、发现新线索、与他人共享知识的利器，而CiteLike则是一种组织学术论文的免费在线服务。
|
| 关 键 词： | 学术标签系统 RefWorks Connotea CiteULike |
| 收稿时间： | 2006-07-10 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-07-072006-09-02 |
A Comparative Analysis of Three Academic Tag Systems |
| |
| Li Aiguo.A Comparative Analysis of Three Academic Tag Systems[J].Library and Information Service,2007,51(2):114-116. |
| |
| Authors: | Li Aiguo |
| |
| Institution: | Institute of Information Science and Technology, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096 |
| |
| Abstract: | The paper introduces the main functions of three kinds of academic tag systems as RefWorks, Connotea and CiteULike, and then compares the similarities and differences. It can be found that while RefWorks is a better creator for bibliography, Connotea is good at references organizing, new clue discovering and knowledge sharing, and CiteULike is a free online service for academic papers organization. The author suggests that academic libraries should take the responsibility for educating the users with a roper use of social software. |
| |
| Keywords: | RefWorks Connotea CiteULike |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《图书情报工作》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《图书情报工作》下载免费的PDF全文 |
